FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390  
391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   >>   >|  
I. 104; _J. A._ ser. V. tom. xvii. 455-456, 507; _Khan. Notice_, 31.) As regards the route taken by Prince Nogodar in his incursion into India, we have no difficulty with BADAKHSHAN. PASHAI-DIR is a copulate name; the former part, as we shall see reason to believe hereafter, representing the country between the Hindu Kush and the Kabul River (see infra, ch. xxx.); the latter (as Pauthier already has pointed out), DIR, the chief town of Panjkora, in the hill country north of Peshawar. In _Ariora-Keshemur_ the first portion only is perplexing. I will mention the most probable of the solutions that have occurred to me, and a second, due to that eminent archaeologist, General A. Cunningham. (1) _Ariora_ may be some corrupt or Mongol form of _Aryavartta_, a sacred name applied to the Holy Lands of Indian Buddhism, of which Kashmir was eminently one to the Northern Buddhists. _Oron_, in Mongol, is a Region or Realm, and may have taken the place of _Vartta_, giving _Aryoron_ or Ariora. (2) "_Ariora_," General Cunningham writes, "I take to be the _Harhaura_ of Sanscrit--i.e. the Western Panjab. Harhaura was the North-Western Division of the _Nava- Khanda_, or Nine Divisions of Ancient India. It is mentioned between _Sindhu-Sauvira_ in the west (i.e. Sind), and _Madra_ in the north (i.e. the Eastern Panjab, which is still called _Madar-Des_). The name of Harhaura is, I think, preserved in the Haro River. Now, the Sind-Sagor Doab formed a portion of the kingdom of Kashmir, and the joint names, like those of Sindhu-Sauvira, describe only one State." The names of the Nine Divisions in question are given by the celebrated astronomer, Varaha Mihira, who lived in the beginning of the 6th century, and are repeated by Al Biruni. (See _Reinaud, Mem. sur l'Inde_, p. 116.) The only objection to this happy solution seems to lie in Al Biruni's remark, that the names in question were in general no longer used even in his time (A.D. 1030). There can be no doubt that _Asidin Soldan_ is, as Khanikoff has said, Ghaiassuddin Balban, Sultan of Delhi from 1266 to 1286, and for years before that a man of great power in India, and especially in the Panjab, of which he had in the reign of Ruknuddin (1236) held independent possession. Firishta records several inroads of Mongols in the Panjab during the reign of Ghaiassuddin, in withstanding one of which that King's eldest son was slain; and there are constant indications of their presence in Sind ti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390  
391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Panjab

 

Ariora

 

Harhaura

 
country
 

General

 

question

 
Kashmir
 

Mongol

 

Cunningham

 
portion

Biruni

 

Ghaiassuddin

 

Divisions

 

Sindhu

 

Sauvira

 

Western

 

Reinaud

 

presence

 

preserved

 

Mihira


astronomer

 

Varaha

 

beginning

 

formed

 

repeated

 

describe

 

kingdom

 

century

 
celebrated
 

longer


constant
 
Ruknuddin
 
inroads
 

eldest

 

Mongols

 

withstanding

 

records

 

independent

 

possession

 

Firishta


indications

 

general

 

remark

 

solution

 

Balban

 

Sultan

 

Khanikoff

 

Soldan

 

Asidin

 
objection