FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423  
424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   >>   >|  
they would have clashed a minute ago if I had not put _autem_ between them. This is the origin of our saying _mecum_ and _tecum_, not _cum me_, and _cum te_, so that they too might be like _nobiscum_ and _vobiscum_. XLVI. And some men find fault with all this; men who are rather late in mending antiquity; for they wish us, instead of saying _Deum atque hominum fidem_, to say _Deorum_. Very likely it may be right, but were our ancestors ignorant of all this, or was it usage that gave them this liberty? Therefore the same poet who had used these uncommon contractions-- "Patris mei mecum factum pudet," for meorum factorum, and, "Texitur: exitium examen rapit," for exitiorum, does not say "_liberum_" as many of us do say in such an expression as _cupidos liberum_, or in _liberum loco_, but, as these men approve, "Neque tuum unquam in gremium extollas liberorum ex te genus." And again he says,-- "Namque aesculapi liberorum...." And another of these poets says in his Chryses, not only "Cives, antiqui amici majorum meum," which was common enough; but he says, with a much more unmusical sound,-- "Consilium, augurium, atque extum interpretes." And again he goes on-- "Postquam prodigium horriferum, putentfum pavos," which are not at all usual contractions in a string of words which are all neuter. Nor should I much like to say _armum judicium_, though the expression occurs in that same poet,-- "Nihilne ad te de judicio armum accidit?" instead of _armorum_. But I do venture (following the language of the censor's returns) to say _jabrum_ and _procum_, instead of _fabrorum_ and _procorum_. And I actually never by any chance say _duorum virorum judicium_, or _triumvirorum capitalium_, or _decemvirorum litibus judicandis_. And Attius said-- "Video sepulchra dua duorum corporam." And at another time he has said,-- "Mulier una duum virum." I know which is proper; but sometimes I speak according to the licence of the present fashion, so far as to say _Proh Deum_, or _Proh Deorum_; and at other times I speak as I am forced to, when I say _trium virum_, not _virorum_, and _sestertium nummum_, not _nummorum_; because with respect to these words there is no variety of usage. XLVII. What am I to say is the reason why they forbid us to say _nosse, judicasse_, and enjoin us to use _novisse_ and _judicavisse_? as if we did not know that in words of this kind it is quite correct to use the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423  
424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
liberum
 

Deorum

 
liberorum
 

duorum

 

judicium

 

virorum

 
expression
 

contractions

 
fabrorum
 
procum

jabrum

 

triumvirorum

 

chance

 

judicasse

 

returns

 
procorum
 

language

 

occurs

 

Nihilne

 

neuter


string

 

novisse

 
venture
 

capitalium

 
censor
 

armorum

 
judicio
 

enjoin

 

accidit

 
litibus

respect
 

present

 

fashion

 

variety

 

licence

 

forced

 

sestertium

 

correct

 

nummum

 

nummorum


judicavisse

 

sepulchra

 

forbid

 
Attius
 
judicandis
 

corporam

 

proper

 

reason

 

Mulier

 
decemvirorum