FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379  
380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   >>   >|  
e originally competent to the cognizance of all infractions of the rights of one citizen by another citizen: and they still retain all their judiciary cognizances not expressly alienated by the federal constitution. The federal constitution alienates from them all cases arising, 1st, under the constitution; 2ndly, under the laws of Congress; 3rdly, under treaties, &c. But this right of free correspondence, whether with a public representative in General Assembly, in Congress, in France, in Spain, or with a private one charged with pecuniary trust, or with a private friend, the object of our esteem, or any other, has not been given to us under, 1st, the federal constitution; 2ndly, any law of Congress; or 3rdly, any treaty; but, as before observed, by nature. It is therefore not alienated, but remains under the protection of our courts. Were the question even doubtful, that is no reason for abandoning it. The system of the General Government is to seize all doubtful ground. We must join in the scramble, or get nothing. Where first occupancy is to give right, he who lies still loses all. Besides, it is not right for those who are only to act in a preliminary form, to let their own doubts preclude the judgment of the court of ultimate decision. We ought to let it go to the House of Delegates for their consideration, and they, unless the contrary be palpable, ought to let it go to the General Court, who are ultimately to decide on it. It is of immense consequence that the States retain as complete authority as possible over their own citizens. The withdrawing themselves under the shelter of a foreign jurisdiction, is so subversive of order and so pregnant of abuse, that it may not be amiss to consider how far a law of _praemunire_ should be revised and modified, against all citizens who attempt to carry their causes before any other than the State courts, in cases where those other courts have no right to their cognizance. A plea to the jurisdiction of the courts of their State, or a reclamation of a foreign jurisdiction, if adjudged valid, would be safe; but if adjudged invalid, would be followed by the punishment of _praemunire_ for the attempt. Think further of the preceding part of this letter, and we will have further conference on it. Adieu. P. S. Observe, that it is not the breach of Mr. Cabell's privilege which we mean to punish: that might lie with Congress. It is the wrong done to the citizens of our di
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379  
380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

constitution

 

Congress

 
courts
 

General

 

jurisdiction

 

citizens

 
federal
 
private
 

praemunire

 

doubtful


citizen
 
adjudged
 
attempt
 

retain

 

alienated

 

cognizance

 
foreign
 

pregnant

 

subversive

 

complete


authority

 

States

 

consequence

 

decide

 

immense

 

ultimately

 

palpable

 

shelter

 

withdrawing

 

conference


punish

 

letter

 

preceding

 

Cabell

 

breach

 
Observe
 
punishment
 

revised

 

modified

 

privilege


invalid
 
contrary
 

reclamation

 

charged

 

pecuniary

 

France

 
Assembly
 

public

 
representative
 

friend