FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
, cap. xii, in Martene, _Thesaurus Anecdotorum_, vol. v. col. 1741. The casuists of the Inquisition, however, came to the rescue, and tried to defend the Church by another subterfuge. They denounced in so many words the death penalty and other similar punishments, while at the same time they insisted upon the State's enforcing them. The formula by which they dismissed an impenitent or a relapsed heretic was thus worded: "We dismiss you from our ecclesiastical forum, and abandon you to the secular arm. But we strongly beseech the secular court to mitigate its sentence in such a way as to avoid bloodshed or danger of death."[1] We regret to state, however, that the civil judges were not supposed to take these words literally. If they were at all inclined to do so, they would have been quickly called to a sense of their duty by being excommunicated. The clause inserted by the canonists was a mere legal fiction, which did not change matters a particle. [1] Eymeric, _Directorium Inquisitorum_, 3a pars, p. 515, col. 2. It is hard to understand why such a formula was used at all. Probably it was first used in other criminal cases in which abandonment to the secular arm did not imply the death penalty, and the Inquisition kept using it merely out of respect to tradition. It seemed to palliate the too flagrant contradiction which existed between ecclesiastical justice and the teaching of Christ, and it gave at least an external homage to the teaching of St. Augustine, and the first Fathers of the Church. Moreover, as it furnished a specious means of evading by the merest form of prohibition against clerics taking part in sentences involving the effusion of blood and death, aud the irregularity resulting therefrom, the Inquisitors used it to reassure their conscience. Finally, however, some Inquisitors, realizing the emptiness of this formula, dispensed with it altogether, and boldly assumed the full responsibility for their sentences. They deemed the role of the State so unimportant in the execration of heretics, that they did not even mention it. The Inquisition is the real judge; it lights the fires. "All whom we cause to be burned," says the famous Dominican Sprenger in his _Malleus Maleficarum_.[1] Although not intended as an accurate statement of fact,[2] it indicates pretty well the current idea regarding the share of the ecclesiastical tribunals in the punishment of heretics. [1] _Malleus maleficarum maleficas
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:
formula
 
ecclesiastical
 
secular
 
Inquisition
 

Inquisitors

 

sentences

 

heretics

 

penalty

 

Church

 

teaching


Malleus

 

effusion

 

external

 

taking

 

involving

 

palliate

 

respect

 
reassure
 
tradition
 

therefrom


irregularity

 

resulting

 
clerics
 

contradiction

 

Augustine

 

evading

 
specious
 

furnished

 

Moreover

 
Fathers

justice

 
merest
 

existed

 

prohibition

 
Christ
 

homage

 

flagrant

 

deemed

 

Maleficarum

 

Although


intended

 
accurate
 
Sprenger
 

Dominican

 

burned

 

famous

 

statement

 

tribunals

 

punishment

 
maleficarum