FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
t understand to-day how Gregory IX could rejoice on learning that fathers did not scruple to denounce their children, children their parents, a wife her husband or a mother her children.[4] [1] 4 and 19, cap _De haereticis_, iv, 5, _Manichaeos_ and _Cognovimus_. [2] Decretal _Vergentis_ of Innocent III. Decretals, cap. x, _De Haereticis_, lib. v, tit. vii. [3] _Mon. Germ., Leges_, vol. ii, sect. iv, p. 197; Ripoll, _Bullarium ordinis Praedicat_., vol. i, p. 126. [4] Bull _Gaudemus_, of April 12, 1233, in Ripoll, vol. i, p. 56. Granting that banishment and confiscation were just penalties for heretics who were also State criminals, was it right for the Church to employ this penal system for the suppression of heresy alone? It is certain that the early Christians would have strongly denounced such laws as too much like the pagan laws under which they were persecuted. St. Hilary voiced their mind when he said: "The Church threatens exile and imprisonment; she in whom men formerly believed while in exile and prison, now wishes to make men believe her by force."[1] St. Augustine was of the same mind. He thus addressed the Manicheans, the most hated sect of his time: "Let those who have never known the troubles of a mind in search for the truth, proceed against you with rigor. It is impossible for me to do so, for I for years was cruelly tossed about by your false doctrines, which I advocated and defended to the best of my ability. I ought to bear with you now, as men bore with me, when I blindly accepted your doctrines."[2] Wazo, Bishop of Liege, wrote in a similar strain in the eleventh century.[3] [1] _Liber contra Auxentium_, cap. iv; cf. supra, p. 6. [2] _Contra epistolam Manichaei, quam vocant Fundamenti_, n. 2 and 3, supra, p. 12. [3] _Vita Vasonis_, cap. xxv and xxvi, Migne, P.L., vol. cxlii, col. 752, 753; cf. supra, p. 51. But, continued St. Augustine, retracting his first theory,--and nearly all the Middle Ages agreed with him,--"these severe penalties are lawful and good when they serve to convert heretics by inspiring them with a salutary fear." The end here justifies the means. Such reasoning was calculated to lead men to great extremes, and was responsible for the cruel teaching of the theologians of the school, who were more logically consistent than the Bishop of Hippo. They endeavored to terrorize heretics by the specter of the stake. St. Augustine, bold as he was, shrank from such
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:

heretics

 

Augustine

 

children

 

doctrines

 

Ripoll

 

Church

 

Bishop

 

penalties

 
logically
 

school


theologians

 

accepted

 
consistent
 
blindly
 

teaching

 

century

 

eleventh

 

contra

 

Auxentium

 

extremes


similar
 

responsible

 

strain

 
ability
 

specter

 

cruelly

 

shrank

 

impossible

 

tossed

 

defended


advocated

 

terrorize

 

endeavored

 
inspiring
 

convert

 
continued
 

lawful

 
Middle
 
severe
 

agreed


retracting
 

theory

 
Manichaei
 

epistolam

 

justifies

 

Contra

 

calculated

 

reasoning

 
vocant
 

Fundamenti