FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
authority. Indeed, to maintain that the Church should use material force, is at once to make her subject to the State; for we can hardly picture her with her own police and gendarmes, ready to punish her rebellious children. Every Catholic believes that the Church is an independent society, fully able to carry out her divine mission without the aid of the secular arm. Whether governments are favorable or hostile to her, she must pursue her course and carry on her work of salvation under them all. . . . . . . . . "Heresy," writes Jean Guiraud, "in the Middle Ages was nearly always connected with some antisocial sect. In a period when the human mind usually expressed itself in a theological form, socialism, communism, and anarchy appeared under the form of heresy. By the very nature of things, therefore, the interests of both Church and State were identical; this explains the question of the suppression of heresy in the Middle Ages."[1] [1] Jean Guiraud, _La repression de l'heresie au moyen age_, in the _Questions d'archeologie et d'histoire_, p. 44. We are not surprised, therefore, that when Church and State found themselves menaced by the same peril, they agreed on the means of defence. If we deduct, from the total number of heretics burned or imprisoned the disturbers of the social order and the criminals against the common law, the number of condemned heretics will be very small. Heretics in the Middle Ages were considered amenable to the laws of both Church and State. Men of that time could not conceive of God and His revelation without defenders in a Christian kingdom. Magistrates were considered responsible for the sins committed against the law of God. Indirectly, therefore, heresy was amenable to their tribunal. They felt it their right and duty to punish not only crimes against society, but sins against faith. The Inquisition, established to judge heretics, is, therefore, an institution whose severity and cruelty are explained by the ideas and manners of the age. We will never understand it, unless we consider it in its environment, and from the viewpoint of men like St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Louis, who dominated their age by their genius. Critics who are ignorant of the Middle Ages may feel at liberty to shower insult and contempt upon a judicial system whose severity is naturally repugnant to them. But contempt does not always imply a reasonable judgment, and to abuse an institution is not n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:

Church

 

Middle

 

heresy

 

heretics

 

Guiraud

 

number

 

institution

 
severity
 

considered

 

amenable


society

 

contempt

 

punish

 

judicial

 

insult

 

Christian

 
system
 

Heretics

 

shower

 

conceive


revelation

 

defenders

 

repugnant

 

imprisoned

 

disturbers

 

reasonable

 
burned
 

judgment

 

social

 

condemned


kingdom

 

common

 

criminals

 

naturally

 

deduct

 

Thomas

 

Aquinas

 

Inquisition

 
established
 

viewpoint


cruelty
 
understand
 

manners

 
environment
 

explained

 
ignorant
 

tribunal

 

Indirectly

 

committed

 

liberty