FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
authority. Indeed, to maintain that the Church should use material force, is at once to make her subject to the State; for we can hardly picture her with her own police and gendarmes, ready to punish her rebellious children. Every Catholic believes that the Church is an independent society, fully able to carry out her divine mission without the aid of the secular arm. Whether governments are favorable or hostile to her, she must pursue her course and carry on her work of salvation under them all. . . . . . . . . "Heresy," writes Jean Guiraud, "in the Middle Ages was nearly always connected with some antisocial sect. In a period when the human mind usually expressed itself in a theological form, socialism, communism, and anarchy appeared under the form of heresy. By the very nature of things, therefore, the interests of both Church and State were identical; this explains the question of the suppression of heresy in the Middle Ages."[1] [1] Jean Guiraud, _La repression de l'heresie au moyen age_, in the _Questions d'archeologie et d'histoire_, p. 44. We are not surprised, therefore, that when Church and State found themselves menaced by the same peril, they agreed on the means of defence. If we deduct, from the total number of heretics burned or imprisoned the disturbers of the social order and the criminals against the common law, the number of condemned heretics will be very small. Heretics in the Middle Ages were considered amenable to the laws of both Church and State. Men of that time could not conceive of God and His revelation without defenders in a Christian kingdom. Magistrates were considered responsible for the sins committed against the law of God. Indirectly, therefore, heresy was amenable to their tribunal. They felt it their right and duty to punish not only crimes against society, but sins against faith. The Inquisition, established to judge heretics, is, therefore, an institution whose severity and cruelty are explained by the ideas and manners of the age. We will never understand it, unless we consider it in its environment, and from the viewpoint of men like St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Louis, who dominated their age by their genius. Critics who are ignorant of the Middle Ages may feel at liberty to shower insult and contempt upon a judicial system whose severity is naturally repugnant to them. But contempt does not always imply a reasonable judgment, and to abuse an institution is not n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:
Church
 

Middle

 

heresy

 
heretics
 
Guiraud
 
number
 

institution

 

severity

 

considered

 

amenable


society
 
contempt
 

punish

 

judicial

 

insult

 

Christian

 

system

 

Heretics

 

shower

 

conceive


revelation
 

defenders

 

repugnant

 
imprisoned
 

disturbers

 
reasonable
 
burned
 

judgment

 

social

 

condemned


kingdom

 

common

 
criminals
 
naturally
 

deduct

 
Thomas
 

Aquinas

 

Inquisition

 

established

 

viewpoint


cruelty

 

understand

 
manners
 

environment

 
explained
 
ignorant
 

tribunal

 

Indirectly

 
committed
 

liberty