FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
f the Syllabus did not decide this question he merely referred us to the letter _Ad Apostolicae Sedis_ of August 22, 1851. But this letter is not at all explicit; it merely condemns those who pretend "to deprive the Church of the external jurisdiction and coercive power which was given her to win back sinners to the ways of righteousness." We would like to find more light on this question elsewhere. But the theologians who at the Vatican Council prepared canons 10 and 12 of the schema _De Ecclesia_ on this very point of doctrine did not remove the ambiguity. They explicitly affirmed that the Church had the right to exercise over her erring children "constraint by an external judgment and salutary penalties," but they said nothing about the nature of these penalties. Was not such silence significant? It authorized, one may safely say, the opinion of those who limited the coercive power of the Church to merely moral constraint. Cardinal Soglia, in a work approved by Gregory XVI and Pius IX, declared that this opinion was "more in harmony with the gentleness of the Church."[1] It also has in its favor Popes Nicholas I[2] and Celestine III,[3] who claimed for the Church of which they were the head the right to use only the spiritual sword. Without enumerating all the modern authors who hold this view, we will quote a work which has just appeared with the imprimatur of Father Lepidi, the Master of the Sacred Palace, in which we find the two following theses proved: 1. "Constraint, in the sense of employing violence to enforce ecclesiastical laws, originated with the state." 2. "The constraint of ecclesiastical laws is by divine right exclusively moral constraint."[4] [1] _Institutiones juris publici ecclesiastici_, 5 ed., Paris, vol. i, pp. 169, 170. [2] _Nicolai_, Ep. ad Albinum archiepiscop., in the _Decretum_, Causa xxxiii, quaest. ii, cap. _Inter haec_. [3] Celestine, according to the criminal code of his day, declared that a guilty cleric, once excommunicated and anathematized, ought to be abandoned to the secular arm, _cum Ecclesia non habeat ultra quid faciat_. Decretals, cap. x, _De judiciis_, lib. ii, tit. i. This was the common teaching. [4] Salvatore di Bartolo. _Nuova expozitione dei criteri teologici_, Roma, 104, pp. 303, 314. The first edition of this work was put upon the Index. The second edition, revised and corrected, and published with the approbation of Father Lepidi, has all the more weight and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:

Church

 

constraint

 

opinion

 

Ecclesia

 

letter

 

ecclesiastical

 

Celestine

 
Lepidi
 

Father

 

declared


question

 

penalties

 

coercive

 

external

 

edition

 

Institutiones

 
exclusively
 

published

 

ecclesiastici

 

revised


corrected

 

criteri

 

publici

 

Palace

 

theses

 

Sacred

 
Master
 

appeared

 

imprimatur

 

proved


Constraint

 

teologici

 

originated

 

approbation

 

weight

 

employing

 

violence

 

enforce

 
divine
 

Nicolai


secular
 
abandoned
 

teaching

 
common
 

excommunicated

 
anathematized
 

judiciis

 

Decretals

 

habeat

 

faciat