FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132  
133   134   135   136   137   >>  
bius, _Vita Constantini_, lib. iv, cap. xxiv. [2] Theodosius II, _Novellae_, tit. iii (438). The Middle Ages inherited these views. Religious unity was then attained throughout Europe. Any attempt to break it was an attack at once upon the Church and the Empire. "The enemies of the Cross of Christ and those who deny the Christian faith," says Pedro II, of Aragon, "are also our enemies, and the public enemies of our kingdom; they must be treated as such."[1] It was in virtue of the same principle that Frederic II punished heretics as criminals according to the common law; _ut crimina publica_. He speaks of the "Ecclesiastical peace" as of old the emperors spoke of the "Roman peace." As Emperor, he considered it his duty "to preserve and to maintain it," and woe betide the one who dared disturb it. Feeling himself invested with both human and divine authority, he enacted the severest laws possible against heresy. What therefore might have remained merely a threatening theory became a terrible reality. The laws of 1224, 1231, 1238, and 1239 prove that both princes and people considered the stake a fitting penalty for heresy. [3] Law of 1197, in De Marca, _Marca Hispanica_, col. 1384. It would leave been very surprising if the Church, menaced as she was by an ever-increasing flood of heresy, had not accepted the State's eager offer of protection. She had always professed a horror for bloodshed. But as long as she was not acting directly, and the State undertook to shed in its own name the blood of wicked men, she began to consider solely the benefits that would accrue to her from the enforcement of the civil laws. Besides, by classing heresy with treason, she herself had laid down the premises of the State's logical conclusion, the death penalty. The Church, therefore, could hardly call in question the justice of the imperial laws, without in a measure going against the principles she herself had advocated. Church and State, therefore, continually influenced one the other. The theology upheld by the Church reacted on the State and caused it to adopt violent measures, while the State in turn compelled the Church to approve its use of force, although such an attitude was opposed to the spirit of early Christianity. The theologians and the canonists put the finishing touches to the situation. Influenced by what was happening around them, their one aim was to defend the laws of their day. This is clearly seen, if we
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132  
133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:
Church
 

heresy

 

enemies

 
considered
 
penalty
 
undertook
 

acting

 

directly

 

solely

 

benefits


accrue
 
wicked
 

increasing

 

menaced

 

surprising

 

accepted

 

defend

 

professed

 

horror

 

protection


bloodshed
 

happening

 

Influenced

 
situation
 

measures

 
reacted
 
caused
 

violent

 

compelled

 

approve


spirit

 

opposed

 
Christianity
 
canonists
 

attitude

 
touches
 

finishing

 

upheld

 

theology

 

logical


premises

 

conclusion

 
Hispanica
 

theologians

 
enforcement
 
Besides
 

classing

 

treason

 
advocated
 

principles