FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120  
121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
ep servants. Husband and wife, however, were allowed access to each other if either or both were imprisoned; and late in the fourteenth century Eymeric declared that zealous Catholics might be admitted to visit prisoners, but not women and simple folk who might be perverted, for converted prisoners, he added, were very liable to relapse, and to infect others, and usually died at the stake.[1] [1] Eymeric, _Directorium_, p. 507. "In the milder form, or _murus largus_, the prisoners apparently were, if well behaved, allowed to take exercise in the corridors, where sometimes they had opportunities of converse with each other, and with the outside world. This privilege was ordered to be given to the aged and infirm by the cardinals who investigated the prison of Carcassonne, and took measures to alleviate its rigors. In the harsher confinement, or _murus strictus_, the prisoner was thrust into the smallest, darkest, and most noisome of cells, with chains on his feet,--in some cases chained to the wall. This penance was inflicted on those whose offences had been conspicuous, or who had perjured themselves by making incomplete confessions, the matter being wholly at the discretion of the Inquisitor. I have met with one case, in 1328, of aggravated false-witness, condemned to the _murus strictissimus_, with chains on both hands and feet. When the culprits were members of a religious order, to avoid scandal, the proceedings were usually held in private, and the imprisonment would be ordered to take place in a convent of their own order. As these buildings, however, were unprovided with cells for the punishment of offenders, this was probably of no great advantage to the victim. In the case of Jeanne, widow of B. de la Tour, a nun of Lespinasse, in 1216, who had committed acts of both Catharan and Waldensian heresy, and had prevaricated in her confession, the sentence was confinement in a separate cell in her own convent, where no one was to enter or see her, her food being pushed in through an opening left for the purpose--in fact, the living tomb known as the _in pace_."[1] [1] Lea, op. cit., vol. i. p. 487. In these wretched prisons the diet was most meager. But "while the penance prescribed was a diet of bread and water, the Inquisition, with unwonted kindness, did not object to its prisoners receiving from their friends contributions of food, wine, money, and garments, and among its documents are such frequent al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120  
121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:

prisoners

 

chains

 

penance

 

allowed

 

Eymeric

 

ordered

 

convent

 

confinement

 

Catharan

 

committed


Lespinasse
 

punishment

 

private

 
imprisonment
 

proceedings

 

scandal

 

culprits

 

members

 
religious
 

advantage


victim

 

Jeanne

 
buildings
 

unprovided

 

Waldensian

 
offenders
 

unwonted

 

Inquisition

 

kindness

 

object


meager
 

prisons

 
prescribed
 
receiving
 

documents

 

frequent

 

garments

 

friends

 

contributions

 

wretched


pushed
 

opening

 

prevaricated

 

confession

 
sentence
 

separate

 

purpose

 

living

 

heresy

 
Directorium