FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
s adopted, she endeavored to mitigate the cruelty with which it was enforced. If this preoccupation is not always visible--and it is not in her condemnation of obdurate heretics--we must at least give her the credit of insisting that torture "should never imperil life or injure limb:" _Cogere citra membri diminutionem et mortis periculum_. We will now ask how the theologians and canonists interpreted this legislation, and how the tribunals of the Inquisition enforced it. CHAPTER VIII THEOLOGIANS, CANONISTS, AND CASUISTS OF THE INQUISITION THE gravity of the crime of heresy was early recognized in the Church. Gratian discussed this question in a special chapter of his _Decretum._[1] Innocent III, Guala, the Dominican, and the Emperor Frederic II, as we have seen, looked upon heresy as treason against Almighty God, i.e., the most dreadful of crimes. [1] _Causa_ xxii, q. vii, cap. 16. The theologians, and even the civil authorities, did not concern themselves much with the evil effects of heresy upon the social order, but viewed it rather as an offense against God. Thus they made no distinction between those teachings which entailed injury on the family and on society, and those which merely denied certain revealed truths. Innocent III, in his constitution of September 23, 1207, legislated particularly against the Patarins, but he took care to point out that no heretic, no matter what the nature of his error might be, should be allowed to escape the full penalty of the law.[1] Frederic II spoke in similar terms in his Constitutions of 1220, 1224, and 1232. This was the current teaching throughout the Middle Ages. [1] Ep. x, 130. But it is important to know what men then understood by the word heresy. We can ascertain this from the theologians and canonists, especially from St. Raymond of Pennafort and St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Raymond gives four meanings to the word heretic, but from the standpoint of the canon law he says: "A heretic is one who denies the faith."[1] St. Thomas Aquinas is more accurate. He declares that no one is truly a heretic unless he obstinately maintains his error, even after it has been pointed out to him by ecclesiastical authority. This is the teaching of St. Augustine.[2] [1] S. Raymundi, _Summa_, lib. i, cap. _De Haereticis_, sect. i, Roman Edition, 1603, p. 39. [2] _Summa_, IIa, IIae, quaest. xi, Conclusio; cf. ibid., ad 3um, quotations from St. Augustine. But by degr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

heretic

 

heresy

 

theologians

 

canonists

 

teaching

 

Thomas

 

Frederic

 

Innocent

 

Raymond

 

Aquinas


enforced
 

Augustine

 

important

 
penalty
 

escape

 

legislated

 

Patarins

 

quotations

 
Constitutions
 

current


matter

 

Middle

 
nature
 

allowed

 

similar

 
ecclesiastical
 

authority

 

Raymundi

 

pointed

 

obstinately


maintains
 

quaest

 
Haereticis
 
Edition
 

Conclusio

 

Pennafort

 

September

 

understood

 

ascertain

 

meanings


accurate
 

declares

 

denies

 

standpoint

 
interpreted
 

legislation

 

tribunals

 

periculum

 

membri

 
diminutionem