FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
ariners the explorers were undoubtedly competent to make such a deduction as this. If Storm and Dieserud are correct, the explorers saw from the north coast of Nova Scotia the same mountains that they had seen from the south coast. [41-2] The Beothuk Indians of Newfoundland, according to Storm. [41-3] Nothing can with certainty be extracted from these names. The chances that they were incorrectly recorded are of course great. Storm contends that they cannot be Eskimo. Captain Holm of the Danish navy, an authority on the Eskimos, says, "It is not _impossible_ that the names may have been derived from Eskimo originals." Fiske says, p. 189, note: "There is not the slightest reason for supposing that there were any Eskimos south of Labrador so late as nine hundred years ago." In this connection Captain Holm says: "It appears to me not sufficiently proven that the now extinct race on America's east coast, the Beothuk, were Indians. I wish to direct attention to the possibility that in the Beothuk we may perhaps have one of the transition links between the Indians and the Eskimo." See Reeves, p. 177, (57). [42-1] The description is clearly suggestive of processions of Christian priests, in white vestments, with banners, and singing (Storm). [42-2] Vellum AM. 557 has not the words "Ireland the Great." As to "White-men's-land" (mentioned also once in the _Landnama-bok_), Storm traces its quasi-historical origin to the Irish visitation of Iceland prior to the Norse settlement. See _Studies on the Vineland Voyages_, p. 61. The explanation is, however, hardly convincing. See _Origines Islandicae_, Vol. II., p. 625. [42-3] AM. 557 says "Iceland's sea" (_i.e._, between Iceland and Markland), and Hauk's Book, "Greenland's sea" (_i.e._, between Iceland and Greenland). [43-1] Thorlak was born in 1085, consecrated bishop in 1118, and died Feb. 1, 1133. These dates are definitely known, and are important. "The bishop's birth-year being certainly known, one can reckon back, and according to the regular allowances, we shall have Hallfrid born about 1060, and her father about 1030, in Vinland, and Karlsefni as far back as 1000." Vigfusson in _Origines Islandicae_, Vol. II., p. 592. Vigfusson seeks to corroborate the above by other allied lineages. If his deductions are correct, they are revolutionary with reference to the generally accepted chronology of the Vinland voyages. He is convinced that Leif belongs to an older generati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Iceland

 

Indians

 

Beothuk

 

Eskimo

 
Origines
 

Vinland

 

Vigfusson

 

bishop

 

correct

 

Eskimos


Islandicae

 

Greenland

 

Captain

 
explorers
 
traces
 
Markland
 

consecrated

 

Thorlak

 

Landnama

 

historical


settlement

 

explanation

 

Vineland

 
Studies
 

ariners

 

visitation

 
origin
 
Voyages
 

convincing

 
allied

lineages
 

deductions

 
corroborate
 

revolutionary

 
reference
 

belongs

 

generati

 
convinced
 

generally

 

accepted


chronology

 
voyages
 

important

 

reckon

 
father
 

Karlsefni

 

Hallfrid

 

regular

 
allowances
 

singing