FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  
ason, _Mason_, p. 264. Despatch No. 6. March 11, 1862.] [Footnote 576: _Ibid._, p. 266. Fort Henry was taken by Grant on February 6 and Fort Donelson on the 15th. The capture of these two places gave an opening for the advance of the Western army southwards into Tennessee and Mississippi.] [Footnote 577: Mason Papers. Spence to Mason, March 18, 1862.] [Footnote 578: Richardson, II, 207. Slidell to Hunter, March 26, 1862.] [Footnote 579: Mason Papers.] CHAPTER IX ENTER MR. LINDSAY The friendly atmosphere created by the lifting of the threatening _Trent_ episode, appears to have made Secretary Seward believe that the moment was opportune for a renewal of pressure on Great Britain and France for the recall of their Proclamations of Neutrality. Seizing upon the victories of Grant at Forts Henry and Donelson, he wrote to Adams on February 28 explaining that as a result the United States, now having access to the interior districts of Alabama, Mississippi and Arkansas, "had determined to permit the restoration of trade upon our inland ways and waters" under certain limitations, and that if this experiment succeeded similar measures would be applied "to the country on the sea-coast, which would be some alleviation of the rigour of the blockade." He added that these "concessions" to foreign nations would "go much further and faster" if those nations would withdraw their "belligerent privileges heretofore so unnecessarily conceded, as we conceive, to the insurgents[580]." This was large talk for a relatively unchanged military situation. Grant had as yet but forced open the door in the West and was still far from having "access to the interior districts" of the states named. Lyons, being shown a copy of this despatch to Adams, commented to Russell that while it might be said the position and the spirit of the Northern armies were greatly improved and notable successes probable, it could not be maintained that hostilities were "so near their conclusion or are carried on upon so small a scale as to disqualify either party for the title of Belligerents[581]." Lyons and Mercier were agreed that this was no time for the withdrawal of belligerent rights to the South, and when the hint was received that the purpose of making such a request was in Seward's mind, the news quite took Thouvenel's breath away[582]. As yet, however, Seward did no more than hint and Adams was quick to advise that the moment had not yet come
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Seward

 

interior

 

access

 
moment
 

districts

 

Papers

 

nations

 
belligerent
 

Mississippi


February
 
Donelson
 

withdraw

 

privileges

 

heretofore

 

faster

 

Russell

 

despatch

 

commented

 

unchanged


military
 

situation

 

insurgents

 

conceive

 

position

 

unnecessarily

 
forced
 
conceded
 

states

 
successes

request

 

making

 
purpose
 

rights

 

withdrawal

 
received
 
Thouvenel
 

advise

 

breath

 

agreed


probable

 

maintained

 

hostilities

 
notable
 

armies

 
Northern
 

greatly

 

improved

 

conclusion

 
Belligerents