FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228  
229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>   >|  
[Footnote 411: Lyons Papers. Hammond to Lyons. F. O., Private. Nov. 16, 1861. This statement about explicit orders to Captain Marchand "not to endeavour, etc.," is in line with Palmerston's understanding of the conversation with Adams. But that there was carelessness in reporting Adams is evident from Hammond's own language for "no instructions to meddle," which Adams did state, is not the same thing as "instructions not to meddle." Adams had no intent to deceive, but was misunderstood. He was himself very anxious over the presence of the _James Adger_ at Southampton, and hurried her Captain away. Adams informed Russell that Palmerston had not understood him correctly. He had told Palmerston, "I had seen the Captain's [Marchand's] instructions, which directed him to intercept the _Nashville_ if he could, and in case of inability to do so, to return at once to New York, keeping his eye on such British ships as might be going to the United States with contraband of war. Lord Palmerston's recollections and mine differed mainly in this last particular. Lord Russell then remarked that this statement was exactly that which he had recollected my making to him. Nothing had been said in the instructions about other British ships." (State Dept., Eng., Vol. 78. No. 80. Adams to Seward. Nov. 29. 1861.) Hammond's letter mentions also the excitement of "the Southerners" in England and that they had "sent out Pilot Boats to intercept and warn the Packet...."] [Footnote 412: Lyons Papers. Lyons to Milne, Dec. 1, 1861.] [Footnote 413: _Ibid._, Russell to Lyons, Nov. 16, 1861.] [Footnote 414: Gladstone Papers. Argyll to Gladstone, Nov. 29, 1861.] [Footnote 415: C.F. Adams, _The Trent Affair_. (_Proceedings_, Mass. Hist. Soc., XLV, p. 58.)] [Footnote 416: Moore, _Int. Law Digest_, VII, p. 772. The much argued international law points in the case of the _Trent_ are given _in extenso_ by Moore.] [Footnote 417: _Parliamentary Papers_, 1862, _Lords_, Vol. XXV. "Correspondence respecting the _Trent_." No. 2.] [Footnote 418: _Ibid._, No. 4.] [Footnote 419: _Ibid._, No. 29. Inclosure.] [Footnote 420: Troops were in fact shipped for Canada. This resulted, after the _Trent_ affair had blown over, in a circumstance which permitted Seward, with keen delight, to extend a courtesy to Great Britain. Bancroft (II, 245) states that these troops "finding the St. Lawrence river full of ice, had entered Portland harbour. When permission
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228  
229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Papers

 

instructions

 

Palmerston

 

Captain

 
Hammond
 

Russell

 

Gladstone

 

meddle

 
intercept

Marchand

 

statement

 
Seward
 

British

 

points

 

international

 

Digest

 

argued

 

Argyll

 
Packet

Proceedings

 

Affair

 

Bancroft

 

Britain

 

states

 

courtesy

 

permission

 
delight
 

extend

 

troops


entered

 

Portland

 

harbour

 

finding

 
Lawrence
 

permitted

 

circumstance

 

respecting

 
Correspondence
 
Parliamentary

Inclosure

 

resulted

 

affair

 

Canada

 

shipped

 

Troops

 

extenso

 
presence
 

Southampton

 

anxious