FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213  
214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   >>   >|  
to this Note. The principle contained in the note, proves that every noun of the second person is in the _nominative_ case; for, as the pronoun of the second person, in such a situation, is always nominative, which is shown by its _form_, it logically follows that the noun, under such circumstances, although it has _no form_ to show its case, must necessarily be in the same case as the pronoun. "Good, pleasure, ease, content, _that_," the antecedent part of "whatever," and _which_, the relative part, are nom. after _art_ understood; Rule 21, and _name_ is nom. to _be_ understood. The second line may be rendered thus; Whether thou art good, or whether thou art pleasure, &c. or _be_ thy _name_ that [thing] which [ever thing] it may be: putting _be_ in the imperative, agreeing with _name_ in the third person. _Something_ is nominative after _art_ understood. EXAMPLES. 1. "All were well _but_ the _stranger_." "I saw nobody but the _stranger_." "All had returned but he." "None but the _brave_ deserve the fair." "The thing they can't _but_ purpose, they postpone." "This life, at best, is _but_ a dream." "It affords _but_ a scanty measure of enjoyment." "If he _but_ touch the hills, they will smoke." "Man is _but_ a reed, floating on the current of time." 2. "Notwithstanding his poverty, he is content." 3. "Open your hand _wide_." "The apples boil _soft_." "The purest clay is that which burns _white_." "Drink _deep_, or taste not the Pierian spring." 4. "_What though_ the swelling surge thou see?" &c. "_What if_ the foot, ordain'd the dust to tread?" &c. REMARKS.--According to the principle of analysis assumed by many of our most critical philologists, _but_ is _always_ a disjunctive conjunction; and agreeably to the same authorities, to construe it, in any case, as a preposition, would lead to error. See false Syntax under Rule 35. They maintain, that its legitimate and undeviating office is, to join on a member of a sentence which _expresses opposition of meaning_, and thereby forms an exception to, or takes from the universality of, the proposition contained in the preceding member of the sentence. That it sustains its true character as a conjunction in all the examples under number 1, will be shown by the following resolution of them.--"All were well but the _stranger [was not well_."] "I saw nobody but [_I saw_] the _stranger_." "None deserve the fair but the _brave_ [_deserve the fair_."] "They postpone th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213  
214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

stranger

 

understood

 

deserve

 

person

 

nominative

 

pronoun

 
sentence
 
member
 

contained

 

conjunction


postpone

 

principle

 

pleasure

 

content

 

REMARKS

 

According

 

philologists

 

sustains

 

agreeably

 
analysis

critical

 

assumed

 

disjunctive

 

character

 

Pierian

 

spring

 

preceding

 

ordain

 
swelling
 

maintain


legitimate

 

Syntax

 

number

 

undeviating

 

meaning

 
expresses
 

opposition

 

office

 

proposition

 

universality


examples

 
construe
 

preposition

 

exception

 

resolution

 

authorities

 
rendered
 

Whether

 

relative

 
agreeing