FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  
the sense necessarily requires_. To say, "I _have_ visited Washington last summer; I _have seen_ the work more than a month ago," is not good _sense_. The constructions should be, "I _visited_ Washington, &c.; I _saw_ the work, &c." "This mode of expression _has been_ formerly much admired:"--"_was_ formerly much admired." "If I _had have_ been there;" "If I _had have_ seen him;" "_Had_ you _have_ known him," are solecisms too gross to need correction. We can say, I _have_ been, I _had_ been; but what sort of a tense is, _had have been_? To place _had_ before the _defective_ verb ought, is an error equally gross and illiterate:--"_had_ ought, _hadn't_ ought." This is as low a vulgarism as the use of _theirn_, _hern_, and _hizzen_, _tother_, _furder_, _baynt_, _this ere_, I _seed_ it, I _tell'd_ him. 3. When we refer to a past action or event, and no part of that time in which it took place; remains, the _imperfect_ tense should be used; but if there is still remaining some portion of the time in which we declare that the thing has been done, the _perfect_ tense should be employed. Thus, we say, "Philosophers _made_ great discoveries in the last century;" "He _was_ much afflicted last year;" but when we refer to the present century, year, week, day, &c. we ought to use the _perfect_ tense; as, "Philosophers _have made_ great discoveries in the present century;" "He _has been_ much afflicted this year;" "I _have read_ the president's message this week;" "We _have heard_ important news this morning;" because these events occurred in this century, this year, this week, and to-day, and still there remains a part of this century, year, week, and day, of which I speak. In general, the perfect tense may be applied wherever the action is connected with the present time, by the actual existence either of the author of the work, though it may have been performed many centuries ago; but if neither the author nor the work now remains, the perfect tense ought not to be employed. Speaking of priests in general, we may say, "They _have_, in all ages, _claimed_ great powers;" because the general order of the priesthood still exists; but we cannot properly say, "The Druid priests _have claimed_ great powers;" because that order is now extinct. We ought, therefore, to say, "The Druid priests _claimed_ great powers." The following examples may serve still farther to illustrate the proper use and application of the tenses. "My br
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

century

 

perfect

 

powers

 

remains

 

claimed

 

general

 
present
 
priests
 

visited

 

employed


action

 

author

 

Washington

 

discoveries

 

admired

 

Philosophers

 

afflicted

 

application

 

illustrate

 
proper

important

 

president

 

events

 

message

 

tenses

 

morning

 

applied

 

centuries

 
Speaking
 

properly


exists

 

priesthood

 

performed

 

extinct

 

farther

 
connected
 

examples

 

existence

 

actual

 

occurred


correction

 
solecisms
 

equally

 

illiterate

 

defective

 

summer

 
necessarily
 

requires

 

constructions

 
expression