FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361  
362   363   364   365   366   367   >>  
terregnum between III. 300 and II. (Must have left its traces. A pasted up break is surely there.) _Second period of royal 0 years. dynasties_ (Treta) (Is this the historical life in the Punjab, with already existing kingdoms?) N. B. What is the third of the pure flames? Is it the people? Atria, latria, patria? Interregnum between II. 200 years. and I. _First period_. Beginning of the history after first _x_ years, with an ideally filled up unmeasured period. Beginning: Manu 6402 317 ---- 6719 B. C. Deduct from this a mythical beginning: a cycle of 5 x 12 = 60, or 600: at most 60 x 60 = 3600, at least 12 x 60=720. Or about 6 kings of 400 years each. Mean time: 2160. Total: 4559. (There remain, deducting 6 from 154 kings (with Dionysos), about 148.) Length of time: 4559 - 1354 = 3205 / 148 = 21-1/2 mean number of years for each historical government; which is very appropriate. Zoroaster lived, according to Eudoxus and Aristotle (compared with Hermippos) 6350 or 6300 B. C. This points to a time of Zoroastrians migrating towards India, or _having migrated, returning_ again. Accept the latter, and the beginning of the 6402 years lies very near the first period, and the Indianizing of the Aryans. Those accounts about Zoroaster are (as Eudoxus already proves) _pre_-Alexandrian, therefore not Indian, but Aryan. Do not the hymns of the Rig-veda, of which several are attributed to the kings of the Treta period, contain hints on that schism? If it really occurred in the Punjab some reminiscence would have been left there of it. The Zend books (wretched things) only give negative evidence. The Brahmans of the most sinful period have of course smothered all that is historical in prodigies, and _this_ wretched taste long appeared to the Germans as _wisdom;_ whilst they despised the (certainly superficial) but still sensible English researches of Sir W. Jones and Co., as philistering! One must oppose this more inflexibly than even that admirable Lassen does. (N. B. Has Colbrooke anything on this? or Wilson?) There may have been _two_ points of contact between the Aryans and the kingdoms on the Euphrates _before_ the expedition of Semiramis. _a._ By means of the Zoroastrian Medo-Babylonian kingdom, which had its capital in Babylon from 2234 B. C. (1903 before Alexander) for about two centuries. _b._ In the oldest primitive times, by the Tu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361  
362   363   364   365   366   367   >>  



Top keywords:

period

 

historical

 
beginning
 

wretched

 

points

 

Eudoxus

 
Aryans
 
Zoroaster
 

Beginning

 

Punjab


kingdoms
 
Babylon
 
prodigies
 

things

 

negative

 

Brahmans

 
smothered
 

Alexander

 

sinful

 

centuries


evidence

 

attributed

 

primitive

 

schism

 

oldest

 

reminiscence

 

occurred

 

whilst

 

Semiramis

 

inflexibly


expedition

 

Zoroastrian

 

oppose

 

Euphrates

 

contact

 
Wilson
 
Colbrooke
 

admirable

 

Lassen

 

despised


superficial
 
capital
 

appeared

 

Germans

 

wisdom

 

English

 
philistering
 

Babylonian

 
kingdom
 

researches