FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712  
713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   >>   >|  
Obj. 2: Further, a thing is not its own cause. But the internal movements of a man are sins. Therefore they are not the cause of sin. Obj. 3: Further, whatever is within man is either natural or voluntary. Now that which is natural cannot be the cause of sin, for sin is contrary to nature, as Damascene states (De Fide Orth. ii, 3; iv, 21); while that which is voluntary, if it be inordinate, is already a sin. Therefore nothing intrinsic can be the cause of the first sin. _On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Duabus Anim. x, 10, 11; Retract. i, 9) that "the will is the cause of sin." _I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), the direct cause of sin must be considered on the part of the act. Now we may distinguish a twofold internal cause of human acts, one remote, the other proximate. The proximate internal cause of the human act is the reason and will, in respect of which man has a free-will; while the remote cause is the apprehension of the sensitive part, and also the sensitive appetite. For just as it is due to the judgment of reason, that the will is moved to something in accord with reason, so it is due to an apprehension of the senses that the sensitive appetite is inclined to something; which inclination sometimes influences the will and reason, as we shall explain further on (Q. 77, A. 1). Accordingly a double interior cause of sin may be assigned; one proximate, on the part of the reason and will; and the other remote, on the part of the imagination or sensitive appetite. But since we have said above (A. 1, ad 3) that the cause of sin is some apparent good as motive, yet lacking the due motive, viz. the rule of reason or the Divine law, this motive which is an apparent good, appertains to the apprehension of the senses and to the appetite; while the lack of the due rule appertains to the reason, whose nature it is to consider this rule; and the completeness of the voluntary sinful act appertains to the will, so that the act of the will, given the conditions we have just mentioned, is already a sin. Reply Obj. 1: That which is within a thing as its natural power, is always in it: but that which is within it, as the internal act of the appetitive or apprehensive power, is not always in it. Now the power of the will is the potential cause of sin, but is made actual by the preceding movements, both of the sensitive part, in the first place, and afterwards, of the reason. For it is because a thing is propo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712  
713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
reason
 

sensitive

 

appetite

 

internal

 

remote

 

appertains

 
proximate
 

apprehension

 

voluntary

 

natural


motive
 

apparent

 

Therefore

 
senses
 
Further
 
movements
 

nature

 
contrary
 

interior

 

double


influences

 

assigned

 

imagination

 

Accordingly

 

explain

 
sinful
 

potential

 
apprehensive
 

appetitive

 

actual


preceding

 

mentioned

 

conditions

 

Divine

 
lacking
 

completeness

 
distinguish
 

inordinate

 

intrinsic

 

Duabus


Augustine

 

states

 

Damascene

 
respect
 

judgment

 
inclined
 
accord
 

twofold

 
Retract
 
answer