honour to tell you that it is MM. Poincare,
Delcasse, Millerand and their friends who have invented and pursued the
nationalistic and chauvinistic policy which menaces to-day the peace of
Europe, and of which we have noted the renaissance. It is a danger for
Europe and for Belgium. I see in it the greatest peril, which menaces the
peace of Europe to-day; not that I have the right to suppose that the
Government of the Republic is disposed deliberately to trouble the peace,
rather I believe the contrary; but the attitude that the Barthou Cabinet
has taken up is, in my judgment, the determining cause of an excess of
militaristic tendencies in Germany.
It is clear from these quotations, and it is for this reason alone that
I give them, that France, supported by the other members of the Triple
Entente, could appear, and did appear, as much a menace to Germany as
Germany appeared a menace to France; that in France, as in other countries,
there was jingoism as well as pacifism; and that the inability of French
public opinion to acquiesce in the loss of Alsace-Lorraine was an active
factor in the unrest of Europe. Once more I state these facts, I do
not criticize them. They are essential to the comprehension of the
international situation.
5. _Russia_.
We have spoken so far of the West. But the Entente between France and
Russia, dating from 1894, brought the latter into direct contact with
Eastern policy. The motives and even the terms of the Dual Alliance are
imperfectly known. Considerations of high finance are supposed to have
been an important factor in it. But the main intention, no doubt, was to
strengthen both Powers in the case of a possible conflict with Germany. The
chances of war between Germany and France were thus definitely increased,
for now there could hardly be an Eastern war without a Western one. Germany
must therefore regard herself as compelled to wage war, if war should come,
on both fronts; and in all her fears or her ambitions this consideration
must play a principal part. Friction in the East must involve friction in
the West, and vice versa. What were the causes of friction in the West we
have seen. Let us now consider the cause of friction in the East.
The relations of Russia to Germany have been and are of a confused and
complicated character, changing as circumstances and personalities change.
But one permanent factor has been the sympathy between the governing
elemen
|