FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  
n whether a considerable passage of Scripture is genuine or not; is to be rejected or retained; was known or was not known in the earliest ages of the Church; then, instead of supplying the least important evidence, Fathers become by far the most valuable witnesses of all. This entire subject may be conveniently illustrated by an appeal to the problem before us. 4. Of course, if we possessed copies of the Gospels coeval with their authors, nothing could compete with such evidence. But then unhappily nothing of the kind is the case. The facts admit of being stated within the compass of a few lines. We have one Codex (the Vatican, B) which is thought to belong to the first half of the ivth century; and another, the newly discovered Codex Sinaiticus, (at St. Petersburg, {~HEBREW LETTER ALEF~}) which is certainly not quite so old,--perhaps by 50 years. Next come two famous codices; the Alexandrine (in the British Museum, A) and the Codex Ephraemi (in the Paris Library, C), which are probably from 50 to 100 years more recent still. The Codex Bezae (at Cambridge, D) is considered by competent judges to be the depository of a recension of the text as ancient as any of the others. Notwithstanding its strangely depraved condition therefore,--the many "monstra potius quam variae lectiones" which it contains,--it may be reckoned with the preceding four, though it must be 50 or 100 years later than the latest of them. After this, we drop down, (as far as S. Mark is concerned,) to 2 uncial MSS. of the viiith century,--7 of the ixth,--4 of the ixth or xth,(29) while cursives of the xith and xiith centuries are very numerous indeed,--the copies increasing in number in a rapid ratio as we descend the stream of Time. Our primitive manuscript witnesses, therefore, are but _five_ in number at the utmost. And of these it has never been pretended that the oldest is to be referred to an earlier date than the beginning of the ivth century, while it is thought by competent judges that the last named may very possibly have been written quite late in the vith. 5. Are we then reduced to this fourfold, (or at most fivefold,) evidence concerning the text of the Gospels,--on evidence of not quite certain date, and yet (as we all believe) not reaching further back than to the ivth century of our aera? Certainly not. Here, FATHERS come to our aid. There are perhaps as many as an hundred Ecclesiastical Writers older than the oldest extant Codex of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

evidence

 

century

 

copies

 

Gospels

 

thought

 
oldest
 

number

 

witnesses

 

competent

 

judges


numerous
 

monstra

 

cursives

 

potius

 

centuries

 

variae

 

preceding

 
lectiones
 

reckoned

 

latest


concerned

 

uncial

 

viiith

 

reaching

 

reduced

 

fourfold

 
fivefold
 
Writers
 

Ecclesiastical

 
extant

hundred

 

Certainly

 

FATHERS

 
manuscript
 

primitive

 

utmost

 

descend

 

stream

 
possibly
 

written


beginning

 

pretended

 

referred

 

earlier

 

increasing

 

considered

 
unhappily
 
authors
 

compete

 

stated