FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109  
110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   >>   >|  
y that two MSS. of the ivth century shall have not only a superior claim to be heard, but almost an exclusive right to dictate which readings are to be rejected, which retained? How ready the most recent editors of the New Testament have shewn themselves to hammer the sacred text on the anvil of Codd. B and {~HEBREW LETTER ALEF~},--not unfrequently in defiance of the evidence of all other MSS., and sometimes to the serious detriment of the deposit,--would admit of striking illustration were this place for such details. Tischendorf's English "_New Testament_"--"with various readings from the three most celebrated manuscripts of the Greek Text" translated at the foot of every page,--is a recent attempt (1869) to popularize the doctrine that we have to look exclusively to two or three of the oldest copies, if we would possess the Word of GOD in its integrity. Dean Alford's constant appeal in his revision of the Authorized Version (1870) to "the oldest MSS." (meaning thereby generally Codd. {~HEBREW LETTER ALEF~} and B with one or two others(134)), is an abler endeavour to familiarize the public mind with the same belief. I am bent on shewing that there is nothing whatever in the character of either of the Codices in question to warrant this servile deference. (_a_) And first,--Ought it not sensibly to detract from our opinion of the value of their evidence to discover that _it is easier to find two consecutive verses in which the two MSS. differ, the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree_? Now this is a plain matter of fact, of which any one who pleases may easily convince himself. But the character of two witnesses who habitually contradict one another has been accounted, in every age, precarious. On every such occasion, only one of them can possibly be speaking the truth. Shall I be thought unreasonable if I confess that these _perpetual_ inconsistencies between Codd. B and {~HEBREW LETTER ALEF~},--grave inconsistencies, and occasionally even gross ones,--altogether destroy my confidence in either? (_b_) On the other hand, discrepant as the testimony of these two MSS. is throughout, they yet, strange to say, conspire every here and there in exhibiting minute corruptions of such an unique and peculiar kind as to betray a (probably not very remote) common corrupt original. These coincidences in fact are so numerous and so extraordinary as to establish a real connexion between thos
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109  
110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

LETTER

 

HEBREW

 

character

 
inconsistencies
 
evidence
 

recent

 
oldest
 

verses

 

consecutive

 

Testament


readings
 

opinion

 

precarious

 

sensibly

 

occasion

 
contradict
 

detract

 

accounted

 

easier

 
matter

differ

 
discover
 

witnesses

 

convince

 

easily

 

pleases

 

habitually

 
peculiar
 

betray

 

unique


corruptions

 

conspire

 

exhibiting

 

minute

 

remote

 

common

 

establish

 

connexion

 

extraordinary

 

numerous


corrupt

 

original

 

coincidences

 

strange

 

confess

 

perpetual

 
occasionally
 

unreasonable

 

thought

 

possibly