reas those of the House are readopted at the
outset of each new Congress.
[170] 286 U.S. 6 (1932).
[171] 338 U.S. 84 (1949).
[172] Title 22, Sec. 2501.
[173] 338 U.S. at 93-95, citing Field _v._ Clark, 143 U.S. 649, 669-673
(1892); United States _v._ Ballin, 144 U.S. 1, 5 (1892); and other
cases.
[174] Burton _v._ United States, 202 U.S. 344, 356 (1906).
[175] In re Chapman, 166 U.S. 661, 669, 670 (1897).
[176] I Story, Constitution, Sec. 840, quoted with approval in Field _v._
Clark, 143 U.S. 649, 670 (1892).
[177] United States _v._ Ballin, 144 U.S. 1, 4 (1892).
[178] Field _v._ Clark, 143 U.S. 649 (1892); Flint _v._ Stone Tracy Co.,
220 U.S. 107, 143 (1911). A parallel rule holds in the case of a duly
authenticated official notice to the Secretary of State that a State
legislature has ratified a proposed amendment to the Constitution. Leser
_v._ Garnett, 258 U.S. 130, 137 (1922); _see also_ Coleman _v._ Miller,
307 U.S. 433 (1939). In Christoffel _v._ United States, 338 U.S. 84
(1949), a sharply divided Court ruled that, in a case brought under the
Perjury Statute of the District of Columbia (Sec. 22-2501 of the D.C.
Code) for alleged perjurious testimony before a Committee of the House of
Representatives, the trial Court erred in charging the jury that it was
free to ignore testimony that less than a quorum of the Committee was in
attendance when the alleged perjury was committed. Four Justices
dissented; and curiously enough only four of the majority were present
when the opinion was delivered, the fifth being indisposed. Remarks
Justice Jackson in his concurring opinion in United States _v._ Bryan
(339 U.S. 323 (1950)), in which the ruling in Christoffel was held to be
inapplicable: "It is ironic that this interference with legislative
procedures was promulgated by exercise within the Court of the very
right of absentee participation denied to Congressmen." Ibid. 344. It
seems unlikely that the Christoffel decision seriously undermines Field
_v._ Clark.
[179] Page _v._ United States, 127 U.S. 67 (1888).
[180] Long _v._ Ansell, 293 U.S. 76 (1934).
[181] Ibid. 83.
[182] United States _v._ Cooper, 4 Dall. 341 (1800).
[183] Williamson _v._ United States, 207 U.S. 425, 446 (1908).
[184] Kilbourn _v._ Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 (1881).
[185] Ibid.
[186] 4 Mass. 1 (1808).
[187] Kilbourn _v._ Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 203, 204 (1881).
[188] Ibid. 205.
[189] Justice Frankfurter for
|