76).
[144] Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880); Ex parte Clarke, 100 U.S.
399 (1880); United States _v._ Gale, 109 U.S. 65 (1883).
[145] 241 U.S. 565 (1916).
[146] Smiley _v._ Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932); Koenig _v._ Flynn, 285 U.S.
375 (1932); Carroll _v._ Becker, 285 U.S. 380 (1932).
[147] 46 Stat. 21 (1929).
[148] 37 Stat. 13, 14 (1911).
[149] Wood _v._ Broom, 287 U.S. 1 (1932).
[150] 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
[151] Ibid. 556, 566.
[152] Ibid. 570-571.
[153] Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651, 661 (1884); United States _v._
Mosley, 238 U.S. 383 (1915); United States _v._ Saylor, 322 U.S. 385
(1944).
[154] In re Coy, 127 U.S. 731, 752 (1888).
[155] Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880); Ex parte Clarke, 100 U.S.
309 (1880); United States _v._ Gale, 109 U.S. 65 (1883).
[156] United States _v._ Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930).
[157] Newberry _v._ United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921).
[158] United States _v._ Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 318 (1941).
[159] Barry _v._ United States ex rel. Cunningham, 279 U.S. 597, 616
(1929).
[160] In re Loney, 134 U.S. 372 (1890).
[161] Cannon's Precedents of the House of Representatives, VI: Sec. 72-74,
180 (1936). _Cf._ Newberry _v._ United States, 256 U.S. 232, 258 (1921).
[162] Barry _v._ United States ex rel. Cunningham, 279 U.S. 597, 614
(1929).
[163] Ibid. 615.
[164] Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives,
IV: Sec. 2895-2905 (1907).
[165] 144 U.S. 1 (1892).
[166] Ibid. 5-6.
[167] Rule V.
[168] Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives, IV: Sec.
2910-2915 (1907); Cannon's Precedents of the House of Representatives,
VI: Sec. 645, 646 (1936).
[169] United States _v._ Ballin, 144 U.S. 1, 5 (1892). It is, of course,
by virtue of its power to determine "rules of its proceedings" that the
Senate enables its members to prevent the transaction of business by
what are termed "filibusters". The question has been raised whether the
rules which support a filibuster are constitutionally compatible with
the clause in the preceding section: "A majority of each [House] shall
constitute a quorum to do business". _See_ Franklin Burdette,
Filibustering in the Senate (Princeton University Press, 1940), 6, 61,
111-112, 227-229, 232-233, 237-238. The Senate is "a continuing body".
McGrain _v._ Daugherty, 273 U.S. 139, 181-182 (1927). Hence its rules
remain in force from Congress to Congress except as they are changed
from time to time, whe
|