FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395  
396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   >>   >|  
., 324 U.S. 626 (1945). _See also_ Illinois Natural Gas Co. _v._ Central Illinois Pub. Serv. Co., 314 U.S. 498 (1942); _also_ Federal Power Commission _v._ East Ohio Gas Co., 338 U.S. 464, decided January 9, 1950, where it was held that a natural gas company which, while operating exclusively in one State, sold there directly to consumers gas transported into the State through the interstate lines of other companies, "a natural gas company" within the meaning of the act of 1938, and so could be required by the Commission to keep uniform accounts and submit reports. [395] 48 Stat. 1064. [396] 49 Stat. 543; since amended in some respects in 1938 (52 Stat. 973) and 1940 (54 Stat. 735). [397] 52 Stat. 973. [398] 27 Stat. 531. As early as 1838 laws were passed requiring the installation of safety devices on steam vessels. 5 Stat. 304 and 626. Along with the Safety Appliance Acts mention should also be made of acts requiring the use of ashpans on locomotives (35 Stat. 476 (1908)); the inspection of boilers (36 Stat. 913 (1911) and 38 Stat. 1192 (1915)); the use of ladders, drawbars, etc., on cars (36 Stat. 298 (1910)); etc. [399] 32 Stat. 943. [400] 222 U.S. 20 (1911). [401] Ibid. 26-27. _See also_ Texas & P.R. Co. _v._ Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33 (1916); and United States _v._ California, 297 U.S. 175 (1936). In the latter case the intrastate railway involved was property of the State. [402] 34 Stat. 1415. [403] Baltimore & O.R. Co. _v._ Interstate Commerce Com., 221 U.S. 612, 618-619 (1911). [404] 34 Stat. 232, disallowed in part in Howard _v._ Illinois Central R. Co., 207 U.S. 463 (1908); 35 Stat. 65, sustained in the Second Employers' Liability Cases (Mondou _v._ New York, N.H. & H.R. Co.), 223 U.S. 1 (1912). [405] _See_ 223 U.S. at 19-22. [406] Ibid. 48. Because the injured employee must, in order to benefit from the act, be employed at the time of his injury "in interstate commerce," the Court's application of it has given rise to some narrow distinctions. _See_ Illinois Central R. Co. _v._ Peery, 242 U.S. 292 (1916); New York Central R. Co. _v._ White, 243 U.S. 188 (1917); Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. _v._ Harrington, 241 U.S. 177 (1916); Louisville & N.R. Co. _v._ Parker, 242 U.S. 13 (1916); Illinois Central R. Co. _v._ Behrens, 233 U.S. 473 (1914); St. Louis, S.F. & T.R. Co. _v._ Seale, 229 U.S. 156 (1913); Pedersen _v._ Delaware, L. & W.R. Co., 229 U.S. 146 (1913); Shanks _v._ Delaware, L. & W.R. Co.,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395  
396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Central

 

Illinois

 
interstate
 

requiring

 

Commission

 

Delaware

 
company
 
natural
 

States

 

Howard


United
 
Employers
 
Liability
 

disallowed

 

Second

 

Mondou

 
sustained
 

intrastate

 

Interstate

 

Baltimore


property

 

involved

 

railway

 

Commerce

 

California

 

benefit

 

Harrington

 

Louisville

 

Parker

 

Chicago


Behrens

 

Pedersen

 

Shanks

 

employee

 

Rigsby

 
injured
 
Because
 

employed

 

narrow

 

distinctions


application
 
injury
 

commerce

 

companies

 

meaning

 

directly

 
consumers
 

transported

 
required
 

reports