FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289  
290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>   >|  
February 20, 1917. [257] As a matter of fact, the entire world knew and knows that she had guaranteed the retrocession. Baron Makino declared it at the Conference. Cf. _The_ (London) _Times_, February 13, 1919; also on May 5, 1919; and Viscount Uchida confirmed it on May 17, 1919. It had also been stated in the Japanese ultimatum to Germany, August 15, 1914, and repeated by Viscount Uchida at the beginning of August, 1919. [258] Mr. Thomas Millard, some of whose letters were published by _The New York Times_. Cf. _Le Temps_, July 29, 1919. [259] _The Chicago Tribune_ (Paris edition), August 20, 1919. X ATTITUDE TOWARD RUSSIA In their dealings with Russia the principal plenipotentiaries consistently displayed the qualities and employed the standards, maxims, and methods which had stood them in good stead as parliamentary politicians. The betterment of the world was an idea which took a separate position in their minds, quite apart from the other political ideas with which they usually operated. Overflowing with verbal altruism, they first made sure of the political and economic interests of their own countries, safeguarding or extending these sources of power, after which they proceeded to try their novel experiment on communities which they could coerce into obedience. Hence the aversion and opposition which they encountered among all the nations which had to submit to the yoke, and more especially among the Russians. Russia's opposition, widespread and deep-rooted, is natural, and history will probably add that it was justified. It starts from the assumption, which there is no gainsaying, that the Conference was convoked to make peace between the belligerents and that whatever territorial changes it might introduce must be restricted to the countries of the defeated peoples. From all "disannexations" not only the Allies' territories, but those of neutrals, were to be exempted. Repudiate this principle and the demands of Ireland, Egypt, India to the benefits of self-determination became unanswerable. Belgium's claim to Dutch Limburg and other territorial oddments must likewise be allowed. Indeed, the plea actually put forward against these was that the Conference was incompetent to touch any territory actually possessed by either neutral or Allied states. Ireland, Egypt, and Dutch Limburg Were all domestic matters with which the Conference had no concern. Despite this fundamental principle Russ
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289  
290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Conference

 

August

 
territorial
 

Limburg

 
Russia
 

Ireland

 

principle

 
political
 

countries

 

opposition


February

 

Viscount

 

Uchida

 
gainsaying
 

convoked

 

belligerents

 
Russians
 

coerce

 

assumption

 

obedience


starts
 

natural

 
history
 
nations
 

submit

 
encountered
 

justified

 

rooted

 

widespread

 

aversion


Repudiate

 

incompetent

 

territory

 
forward
 

likewise

 

allowed

 

Indeed

 

possessed

 

concern

 

Despite


fundamental

 

matters

 
domestic
 

neutral

 

Allied

 

states

 

oddments

 

Allies

 

territories

 
disannexations