onal
ethics, or explain it as a series of well-meant expedients begotten by
the practical logic of momentary convenience, we must confess that its
gifted authors lacked a direct eye for the wayward tides of national and
international movements; were, in fact, smitten by political blindness,
and did the best they could in these distressing circumstances.
FOOTNOTES:
[260] From whatever angle this Russian business is viewed, the policy of
the Allies, if it can be dignified with that name, seems to be a
compound of weakness, ineptitude, and shilly-shally."--Cf. _The
Westminster Gazette_, July 5, 1919.
[261] Cf. _Journal des Debats_, August 13, 1919. Article by M. Auguste
Gauvain.
[262] There can be no doubt that the Bolshevist government under
Lunatcharsky has made a point of furthering the arts, sciences, and
elementary instruction. All reports from foreign travelers and from
eminent Russians--one of these my university fellow-student, now
perpetual secretary of the Academy--agree about this silver lining to a
dark cloud.
[263] This latter fact was doubtless known to the British government,
which decided as early as March to recall the British troops from
northern Russia.
[264] I published the facts in _The Daily Telegraph_, April 21, and _The
Public Ledger_ of Philadelphia, April 10, 1919.
[265] Colonel House is said to have dissociated himself from the
President on this occasion.
[266] It was sent at the end of October, 1918, and to my knowledge was
not published in full.
[267] Omsk, Ekaterinodar, Archangel, and the Crimea. The last-named
disappeared soon afterward.
[268] See Chapter IV "Censorship and Secrecy," p. 132.
[269] Pertinax in _L'Echo de Paris_, July 5, 1919.
[270] This admission was made to a distinguished member of the
Diplomatic Corps.
[271] In _The Daily Telegraph_, June 19, 1919, and in _The Public
Ledger_ of Philadelphia.
[272] In July M. Pichon told the Esthonian delegates that France
recognized the independence of their country in principle. But this
declaration was not taken seriously, either by the Russians or by the
French.
XI
BOLSHEVISM
What is Bolshevism? A generic term that stands for a number of things
which have little in common. It varies with the countries where it
appears. In Russia it is the despotism of an organized and unscrupulous
group of men in a disorganized community. It might also be termed the
frenzy of a few epileptics running a
|