FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363  
364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   >>   >|  
commence with _sensation_, and proceed, by induction, from the known to the unknown. The repetition of sensations produces _recollection_, recollection _experience_, and experience produces _science_.[676] "Science and art result unto men by means of experience...." "Art comes into being when, from a number of experiences, one universal opinion is evolved, which will embrace all similar cases. For example, if you know that a certain remedy has cured Callias of a certain disease, and that the same remedy has produced the same effect on Socrates and on several other persons, that is _Experience_; but to know that a certain remedy will cure all persons attacked with that disease, is _Art_. Experience is a knowledge of individual things (ton kathekasta); art is that of universals (ton katholou)."[677] [Footnote 674: "Republic," bk. vi. ch. xx.] [Footnote 675: "Timaeus," ch. ix.] [Footnote 676: "Metaphysics," bk. i. ch. i.] [Footnote 677: Ibid.] Disregarding the Platonic notion of the unity of all Being in the absolute idea, he fixed his immediate attention on the manifoldness of the phenomenal, and by a classification of all the objects of experience he sought to attain to "general notions." Concentrating all his attention on the individual, the contingent, the particular, he ascends, by induction, from the particular to the _general_; and then, by a strange paralogism, "the _universal_" is confounded with "the _general_" or, by a species of logical sleight-of-hand, the general is transmuted into the universal. Thus "induction is the pathway from particulars to universals."[678] But how universal and necessary principles can be obtained by a generalization of limited experiences is not explained by Aristotle. The experiences of a lifetime, the experiences of the whole race, are finite and limited, and a generalization of these can only give the finite, the limited, and at most, the general, but not the universal. [Footnote 679: "Topics," bk. i. ch. xii.; "Ethics," bk. vi. ch. iii.] Aristotle admits, however, that there are ideas or principles in the mind which can not be explained by experience, and we are therefore entitled to an answer to the question--how are these obtained? "Sensible experience gives us what is _here_, _there_, _now_, in such and such a manner, but it is impossible for it to give what is _everywhere_ and _at all times_."[680] He tells us further, that "science is a conception of the mi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363  
364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

experience

 

universal

 
Footnote
 

general

 

experiences

 
remedy
 
induction
 
limited
 

individual

 

attention


Experience
 

persons

 

generalization

 
obtained
 
Aristotle
 
explained
 
universals
 

principles

 

finite

 
disease

produces

 

recollection

 

science

 

logical

 

sleight

 
conception
 

species

 

confounded

 

transmuted

 

particulars


pathway

 

entitled

 
Topics
 

Ethics

 

paralogism

 

admits

 

lifetime

 
manner
 

answer

 

question


Sensible

 

impossible

 

Platonic

 

similar

 

embrace

 
opinion
 
evolved
 

Socrates

 

effect

 

produced