FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908  
909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   >>   >|  
er suffrage, or remove the exclusion so that colored citizens can vote; if they have derived the franchise from that, then the argument is against me. But, if it does confer it, then judgment must go for me. Let us read it: ARTICLE XV., Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Sec. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. (15 Stat., p. 316.) You see in a moment this does not confer anything. It uses no words of grant or grace, apt or otherwise, nor does it profess to. It expressly recognizes, as an already existing fact, that the citizens of the United States have the right to vote. The right which shall thus be respected is a right peculiar to the citizen--it is not a personal right, but a political right; and a right to vote, the same one mentioned in the second section of the XIV. Amendment--a right not created or conferred by the XV. Amendment. It could not be, for it existed, and, as I have just said, was spoken of in the XIV. Amendment; so that it must be as old as that at the least. This amendment is a solemn mandate to all concerned not to deny this right, because it existed, and because it was of the highest value. Justice WYLIE: It is not to be denied for either of the three reasons mentioned. Mr. RIDDLE: Yes, your honor, I have not reached that; I am now only showing that it is a right--a citizen right--and older than the XV. Amendment; but, if your honor intends to infer that, because the right can not be denied in any one of those cases, that, therefore, it may be in all others, then you have another instance of a constitutional right to deny a constitutional right; and, without vanity, I have already pulverized that assumption. It is thus absolutely certain that colored male citizens do not claim their admitted right to vote from this XV. Amendment. They had it before, and this came in to protect and secure them in its enjoyment. Whence did they derive it? From the XIV. Amendment? If so, then did women acquire it by the same amendment? Was it an inherent right in them as a part of "the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908  
909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Amendment

 

citizens

 
denied
 

States

 

United

 

citizen

 

colored

 

amendment

 

constitutional

 

confer


existed

 

mentioned

 

reached

 

RIDDLE

 

highest

 

solemn

 
mandate
 

showing

 

concerned

 

Justice


reasons

 

assumption

 

protect

 

secure

 
admitted
 

enjoyment

 

Whence

 
inherent
 

acquire

 
derive

intends
 
absolutely
 

pulverized

 

instance

 

vanity

 

previous

 

account

 
abridged
 
condition
 

servitude


enforce

 
article
 
Congress
 

Section

 

derived

 

franchise

 
argument
 

exclusion

 

remove

 

suffrage