FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928  
929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   >>   >|  
profession of an attorney-at-law upon the same terms, conditions, and restrictions as are applied to and imposed upon every other citizen of the State of Illinois, and none other. And that having complied with all the laws of the State, and the rules and regulations of this honorable court, for the admission of attorneys, it is contrary to the true intent and meaning of said Amendment and said "Civil Rights Bill," for your petitioner to be refused a license to practice law, upon the sole ground of her "married condition." VIII. And your petitioner further claims, that having been born in the State of Vermont, and having been a citizen of the State last named, and of the United States, and having removed to the State of Illinois, where she has resided for many years, that under the second section of the IV. Article of the Constitution of the United States, which is in these words, "The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States," she has guaranteed to her the privileges and immunities which every other citizen of the State of Illinois has, among which may be named the protection of the Government, the right to the enjoyment of life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, to reside in the State, to carry on trade, and the right to follow any professional pursuit under the laws of the State, which must work equally upon all the citizens of the State, and that under this section of the Constitution she has a right to receive a license to practice law upon the same terms and conditions as the most favored citizen of the State of Illinois. (People _vs._ Washington, 36 California R., 662. Corfield _vs._ Coryell, 4 Washington C. R., 381.) MYRA BRADWELL. On last week the court filed an opinion denying the application, for a very carefully prepared copy of which we are indebted to Mr. Freeman: OPINION OF THE COURT DENYING THE APPLICATION. [_In the matter of the application of Mrs. Myra Bradwell for a license to practice as an Attorney-at-Law._] OPINION OF THE COURT DELIVERED BY MR. JUSTICE LAWRENCE.--At the last term of the court Mrs. Myra Bradwell applied for a license as an attorney-at-law, present
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928  
929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Illinois

 

citizen

 
license
 

States

 

citizens

 

practice

 

United

 

conditions

 

attorney

 

section


petitioner

 

OPINION

 

immunities

 

application

 

privileges

 

Bradwell

 
Constitution
 

applied

 

Washington

 

Coryell


People

 

pursuit

 

professional

 

follow

 
equally
 

receive

 

California

 
favored
 

Corfield

 
DELIVERED

Attorney
 
matter
 

APPLICATION

 

present

 

LAWRENCE

 

JUSTICE

 

DENYING

 
opinion
 
denying
 

carefully


indebted

 
Freeman
 
prepared
 

BRADWELL

 

Article

 

refused

 
Rights
 

meaning

 

Amendment

 

ground