FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916  
917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   >>   >|  
ism and ridicule. The Washington _Sunday Morning Herald_ wittily reported[166] this trial in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. On July 21st, 1871, Ellen Rand Van Valkenburg, of Santa Cruz, California, having applied for registration and been refused, brought suit against Albert Brown, of Brown County, who acted as Register upon this occasion. Although later suits exceeded this in interest it was notable for being the first decision under the new amendments.[167] September 16, 1871, suit was brought by Carrie S. Burnham, an unmarried woman, residing in Philadelphia. She was duly assessed by the canvassers of the Fourteenth Ward of that city as a resident of the Eleventh Election District of that ward. Two days afterwards she paid her tax, and her name was registered on the canvassers' printed list of legal voters in that division. Having complied with all the laws regulating suffrage in Pennsylvania, she presented her ballot in legal form at the proper time and place at the general election, but her vote was refused. Her argument in the Court of Common Pleas and the opinion of the judge, will be given in the Pennsylvania chapter. Mrs. Catharine V. Waite, of Illinois, also instituted suit for the refusal of her vote proffered in the fall of 1871, and received an adverse decision, a report of which will be found in the Illinois chapter. Two years previous to these suits for the recognition of the political rights of women a contest of a different character was commenced in Illinois. Mrs. Myra Bradwell, editor of the Chicago _Legal News_, in September, 1869, having passed the examination, and received the required certificate of qualification, applied for admission to the bar of that State, which was refused by its Supreme court, on the ground that she was a woman. She made this denial of her civil rights a test case by bringing a writ of error against the State of Illinois in the Supreme Court of the United States. We copy from the _Legal News_ of February 5, 1870: A WOMAN CAN NOT PRACTICE LAW OR HOLD ANY OFFICE IN ILLINOIS. _Full Report of the Proceedings in the Supreme Court upon the Application of Myra Bradwell to be admitted to the Bar._ LICENSING ATTORNEYS.--The following extract from rule 76 shows what is required by the Supreme Court of applicants for admission to the bar: _Ordered_, That rules 69 and 70 be rescinded, and applicants f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916  
917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Supreme

 
Illinois
 

refused

 

Bradwell

 

decision

 

September

 

rights

 

Pennsylvania

 

canvassers

 

admission


required

 

received

 

applied

 

chapter

 

applicants

 

District

 

brought

 

examination

 

refusal

 

rescinded


proffered

 

previous

 

certificate

 

recognition

 

qualification

 

political

 

instituted

 

contest

 
commenced
 

character


editor

 

adverse

 
report
 

Chicago

 

passed

 

ILLINOIS

 

Report

 

Proceedings

 

OFFICE

 

Application


admitted

 

Ordered

 
extract
 

LICENSING

 

ATTORNEYS

 
PRACTICE
 

bringing

 

denial

 

ground

 
United