FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898  
899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   >>   >|  
of the people. In fact, the people of each State have gone much further, and settled a far more critical question, by deciding who shall be the voters entitled to approve and reject the constitution framed by a delegated body under their direction. In the adoption of no State constitution has the assent been asked of any but the qualified voters; and women, and minors, and other persons not recognized as voters by existing laws, have been studiously excluded. And yet the constitution has been deemed entirely obligatory upon them as well as upon the minority, who voted against it. From this it will be seen how little, even in the most free of republican governments, any abstract right of suffrage, or any original and indefeasible privilege, has been recognized in practice. This, remember, was written thirty years ago. Where would Story be now, if living? I beg also to read a single paragraph from the "Spirit of Laws," London edition, vol. I., p. 220: "All the inhabitants of the several districts ought to have the right to vote at the election of the representatives," etc. All of the inhabitants, says Montesquieu, ought to have the right to vote. Under such a rule I suppose my learned opponent would contend that a woman could not be an inhabitant, of course. I feel that I ought to apologize for presenting this point to this extent; it is so obvious, and rests on such broad and ample ground, that argument for it is without excuse, and I rest it here. So that if you consider this XIV. Amendment as a grant from the sovereign, then, like all such grants, you must take it most strongly against the grantor, and most favorable to the subject. And if, as I have shown, it is in favor of natural right, then must you construe it most strongly to extend that right. No court needs authority for these propositions. The SECOND proposition of my brief is, _that by the old common law of our English ancestors, the old storehouse of our rights and liberties, as well as the arsenal where we find weapons for their defense, woman always possessed this right of suffrage_. I will show by several English cases, by long usage, and general understanding, by principle and preced
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898  
899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

voters

 

constitution

 
recognized
 

English

 

strongly

 

inhabitants

 

suffrage

 

people

 

excuse

 

Amendment


grants

 

sovereign

 

argument

 

extent

 

presenting

 

settled

 
apologize
 

grantor

 

ground

 

obvious


inhabitant

 

subject

 

weapons

 

defense

 
arsenal
 

storehouse

 

rights

 
liberties
 

possessed

 
understanding

principle
 
preced
 

general

 

ancestors

 

extend

 

construe

 

natural

 
contend
 
authority
 

common


proposition

 
SECOND
 
propositions
 

favorable

 

learned

 

republican

 
governments
 

abstract

 

direction

 

remember