FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2386   2387   2388   2389   2390   2391   2392   2393   2394   2395   2396   2397   2398   2399   2400   2401   2402   2403   2404   2405   2406   2407   2408   2409   2410  
2411   2412   2413   2414   2415   2416   2417   2418   2419   2420   2421   2422   2423   2424   2425   2426   2427   2428   2429   2430   2431   2432   2433   2434   2435   >>   >|  
all, such_, &c.," are every one of them here; for they all are _Adjectives_, and not _Pronouns_. And it is obvious, that the corresponding words in Latin, Greek, or French, are adjectives likewise, and are, for the most part, so called; so that, from General Grammar, or "the usages of other languages," arises an argument for ranking them as adjectives, rather than as pronouns. But the learned Dr. Bullions, after improperly assuming that every adjective must "express _the quality of a noun_," and thence arguing that no such definitives can rightly be called _adjectives_, most absurdly suggests, that "_other languages_," or "_the usages of_ other languages," generally assign to these _English words_ the place of _substitutes_! But so remarkable for self-contradiction, as well as other errors, is this gentleman's short note upon the classification of these words, that I shall present the whole of it for the reader's consideration. "NOTE. The distributives, demonstratives, and indefinites, cannot strictly be called _pronouns_; since they never stand _instead_ of nouns, but always _agree_ with _a noun_ expressed or understood: _Neither can they be properly_ called _adjectives_, since they never express _the quality of a noun_. They are here classed _with pronouns_, in accordance with _the usages of other languages_, which _generally assign them this place_. All these, together with the _possessives_, in parsing, may _with sufficient propriety_ be termed _adjectives_, being _uniformly regarded as such_ in syntax."--_Bullions's Principles of English Gram._, p. 27. (See also his _Appendix_ III, E. Gram., p. 199.) What a sample of grammatical instruction is here! The pronominal adjectives "cannot properly _be called adjectives_," but "they may with sufficient propriety be _termed adjectives_!" And so may "_the possessives_," or _the personal pronouns in the possessive case_! "Here," i.e., in _Etymology_, they are all "_classed with pronouns_;" but, "in _Syntax_," they are "uniformly _regarded as adjectives_!" Precious MODEL for the "Series of Grammars, English, Latin, and Greek, all on THE SAME PLAN!" [173] _Some_, for _somewhat_, or _in some degree_, appears to me a vulgarism; as, "This pause is generally _some_ longer than that of a period."--_Sanborn's Gram._, p. 271. The word _what_ seems to have been used adverbially in several different senses; in none of which is it much to be commended: as, "Though I forbear, _what_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2386   2387   2388   2389   2390   2391   2392   2393   2394   2395   2396   2397   2398   2399   2400   2401   2402   2403   2404   2405   2406   2407   2408   2409   2410  
2411   2412   2413   2414   2415   2416   2417   2418   2419   2420   2421   2422   2423   2424   2425   2426   2427   2428   2429   2430   2431   2432   2433   2434   2435   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

adjectives

 

pronouns

 

called

 

languages

 

generally

 
English
 

usages

 

quality

 

sufficient

 

propriety


uniformly

 

assign

 
express
 

termed

 
properly
 

possessives

 

classed

 
regarded
 
Bullions
 

forbear


Appendix

 

sample

 

grammatical

 

adverbially

 

Principles

 

syntax

 
senses
 
commended
 

instruction

 

Though


possessive

 

longer

 

Sanborn

 

period

 
appears
 

vulgarism

 

personal

 
degree
 

Etymology

 

Series


Grammars

 

Precious

 
Syntax
 

pronominal

 

consideration

 

improperly

 

assuming

 

adjective

 

learned

 

absurdly