FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   2239   2240   2241   2242   2243   2244   2245   2246   2247   2248   2249   2250   2251   2252   2253   2254   2255   2256   2257  
2258   2259   2260   2261   2262   2263   2264   2265   2266   2267   2268   2269   2270   2271   2272   2273   2274   2275   2276   2277   2278   2279   2280   2281   2282   >>   >|  
ar_, p. 32. This derivation of _The_ is quite improbable; because the shortening of a monosyllable of five letters by striking out the third and the fifth, is no usual mode of abbreviation. Bosworth's Dictionary explains THE as "An indeclinable article, often used for all the cases of Se, seo, thaet, especially in adverbial expressions and in corrupt Anglo-Saxon, as in the _Chronicle_ after the year 1138." OBS. 4--Dr. Latham, in a section which is evidently neither accurate nor self-consistent, teaches us--"that there exist in the present English two powers of the word spelled _t-h-e_, or of the so-called definite article;" then, out of sixteen Anglo-Saxon equivalents, he selects two for the roots of this double-powered _the_; saying, "Hence the _the_ that has originated out of the Anglo-Saxon _thy_ is one word; whilst the _the_ that has originated out of the Anglo-Saxon _the_, [is] another. The latter is the common article: the former the _the_ in expressions like _all the more, all the better--more by all that, better by all that_, and the Latin phrases _eo majus, eo melius_."--_Latham's Hand-Book_, p. 158. This double derivation is liable to many objections. The Hand-Book afterwards says, "That the, in expressions like _all the more, all the better_, &c., is _no article_, has already been shown."--P. 196. But in fact, though _the_ before comparatives or superlatives be no article, Dr. Latham's etymologies prove no such thing; neither does he anywhere tell us what it is. His examples, too, with their interpretations, are all of them fictitious, ambiguous, and otherwise bad. It is uncertain whether he meant his phrases for counterparts to each other or not. If _the_ means "_by that_," or _thereby_, it is an _adverb_; and so is its equivalent "_eo_" denominated by the Latin grammarians. See OBS. 10, under Rule I. SECTION II.--DERIVATION OF NOUNS. In _English_, Nouns are derived from nouns, from adjectives, from verbs, or from participles. I. Nouns are derived from _Nouns_ in several different ways:-- 1. By the adding of _ship, dom, ric, wick, or, ate, hood_, or _head_: as, _fellow, fellowship; king, kingdom; bishop, bishopric; bailiff_, or _baily, bailiwick; senate, senator; tetrarch, tetrarchate; child, childhood; God, Godhead_. These generally denote dominion, office, or character. 2. By the adding of _ian_: as, _music, musician; physic, physician; theology, theologian; grammar, grammarian; college, coll
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   2239   2240   2241   2242   2243   2244   2245   2246   2247   2248   2249   2250   2251   2252   2253   2254   2255   2256   2257  
2258   2259   2260   2261   2262   2263   2264   2265   2266   2267   2268   2269   2270   2271   2272   2273   2274   2275   2276   2277   2278   2279   2280   2281   2282   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

article

 

Latham

 

expressions

 

adding

 

derived

 
double
 

originated

 

phrases

 

English

 

derivation


physician

 

adverb

 
theology
 

theologian

 
grammar
 

physic

 

grammarians

 
equivalent
 
denominated
 

musician


grammarian

 

fictitious

 

ambiguous

 

interpretations

 

examples

 

counterparts

 
uncertain
 
SECTION
 

senator

 

tetrarch


tetrarchate

 

college

 

kingdom

 

bishop

 
bailiff
 

fellowship

 

senate

 
bailiwick
 

fellow

 

dominion


denote

 

generally

 
bishopric
 

office

 

DERIVATION

 

childhood

 

participles

 

Godhead

 

adjectives

 

character