FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516  
517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   >>   >|  
e nominative and the possessive. This was certainly an important question, touching a fundamental principle of our grammar; and any erroneous opinion concerning it, might well go far to condemn the book that avouched it. Every intelligent teacher must see this. For what sense could be made of parsing, without supposing an objective case to nouns? or what propriety could there be in making the words, _of_, and _to_, and _from_, govern or compose three different cases? Again, with what truth can it be said, that nouns have _no cases_ in English? or what reason can be assigned for making more than three? OBS. 4.--Public opinion is now clear in the decision, that it is _expedient_ to assign to English nouns three cases, and no more; and, in a matter of this kind, what is expedient for the purpose of instruction, is right. Yet, from the works of our grammarians, may be quoted every conceivable notion, right or wrong, upon this point. Cardell, with Tooke and Gilchrist on his side, contends that English nouns have _no cases_. Brightland averred that they have neither cases nor genders.[162] Buchanan, and the author of the old British Grammar, assigned to them _one_ case only, the possessive, or genitive. Dr. Adam also says, "In English, nouns have _only one case_, namely, the genitive, or possessive case."--_Latin and Eng. Gram._, p. 7. W. B. Fowle has two cases, but rejects the word _case_: "We use the simple term _agent_ for a _noun that acts_, and _object_ for the object of an action."--_Fowle's True Eng. Gram._, Part II, p. 68. Spencer too discards the word _case_, preferring "_form_," that he may merge in one the nominative and the objective, giving to nouns _two_ cases, but neither of these. "Nouns have _two Forms_, called the _Simple_ and [the] _Possessive_."--_Spencer's E. Gram._, p. 30. Webber's Grammar, published at Cambridge in 1832, recognizes but _two_ cases of nouns, declaring the objective to be "altogether superfluous."--P. 22. "Our substantives have no more cases than two."--_Jamieson's Rhet._, p. 14. "A Substantive doth not properly admit of more than two cases: the Nominative, and the Genitive."--_Ellen Devis's Gram._, p. 19. Dr. Webster, in his Philosophical Grammar, of 1807, and in his Improved Grammar, of 1831, teaches the same doctrine, but less positively. This assumption has also had the support of Lowth, Johnson, Priestley, Ash, Bicknell, Fisher, Dalton, and our celebrated Lindley Murray.[163] In Child
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516  
517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
English
 

Grammar

 

possessive

 

objective

 

expedient

 

object

 

making

 

Spencer

 

genitive

 

assigned


opinion
 
nominative
 

called

 

Simple

 

Possessive

 
superfluous
 

giving

 
altogether
 
Cambridge
 

published


declaring
 

Webber

 
recognizes
 

preferring

 

simple

 
action
 

discards

 

assumption

 

support

 

positively


teaches

 
doctrine
 

Johnson

 

Priestley

 

Lindley

 

Murray

 
celebrated
 

Dalton

 

Bicknell

 
Fisher

Improved

 
Substantive
 

rejects

 
substantives
 

Jamieson

 

properly

 

Webster

 

Philosophical

 

Nominative

 

Genitive