FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565  
566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   >>   >|  
m, in the day of judgement, than for thee."--_Matt._, xi, 24. Now, although [Greek: anektoteron], _more tolerable_, is in itself a good comparative, who would dare infer from this text, that in the day of judgement Capernaum shall fare _tolerably_, and Sodom, _still better_? There is much reason to think, that the essential nature of these grammatical degrees has not been well understood by those who have heretofore pretended to explain them. If we except those few approximations to sensible qualities, which are signified by such words as _whitish, greenish, &c._, there will be found no actual measure, or inherent degree of any quality, to which the simple form of the adjective is not applicable; or which, by the help of intensive adverbs of a positive character, it may not be made to express; and that, too, without becoming either comparative or superlative, in the technical sense of those terms. Thus _very white, exceedingly white, perfectly white_, are terms quite as significant as _whiter_ and _whitest_, if not more so. Some grammarians, observing this, and knowing that the Romans often used their superlative in a sense merely intensive, as _altissimus_ for _very high_, have needlessly divided our English superlative into two, "_the definite_, and the _indefinite_;" giving the latter name to that degree which we mark by the adverb _very_, and the former to that which alone is properly called the superlative. Churchill does this: while, (as we have seen above,) in naming the degrees, he pretends to prefer "what has been established by long custom."--_New Gram._, p. 231. By a strange oversight also, he failed to notice, that this doctrine interferes with his scheme of _five_ degrees, and would clearly furnish him with _six_: to which if he had chosen to add the "_imperfect degree_" of Dr. Webster, (as _whitish, greenish, &c._,) which is recognized by Johnson, Murray, and others, he might have had _seven_. But I hope my readers will by-and-by believe there is _no need_ of more than _three_. OBS. 9.--The true nature of the Comparative degree is this: it denotes either some _excess_ or some _relative deficiency_ of the quality, when one thing or party is compared with an other, in respect to what is in both: as, "Because the foolishness of God is _wiser_ than men; and the weakness of God is _stronger_ than men."--_1 Cor._, i, 25. "Few languages are, in fact, _more copious_ than the English."--_Blair's Rhet._, p. 87. "Our
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565  
566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

degree

 

superlative

 

degrees

 
greenish
 
whitish
 

English

 
quality
 

intensive

 

judgement

 

comparative


nature
 

furnish

 

interferes

 

scheme

 

chosen

 
Johnson
 

Murray

 

recognized

 

Webster

 
imperfect

doctrine

 
failed
 

naming

 

pretends

 

prefer

 

called

 

Churchill

 
established
 

strange

 

oversight


custom

 

notice

 

weakness

 

stronger

 

respect

 

Because

 

foolishness

 

copious

 

languages

 

properly


readers

 

Comparative

 

compared

 

deficiency

 

denotes

 

excess

 
relative
 

adverb

 

actual

 

measure