FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568  
569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   >>   >|  
ir definitions are _true_. OBS. 12.--The common assertion of the grammarians, that the superlative degree is not applicable to two _objects_,[177] is not only unsupported by any reason in the nature of things, but it is contradicted in practice by almost every man who affirms it. Thus Maunder: "When only two persons or things are spoken of comparatively, to use the superlative is improper: as, 'Deborah, my dear, give those two boys a lump of sugar each; and let Dick's be the largest, because he spoke first.' This," says the critic, "should have been 'larger.'"--_Maunder's Gram._, p. 4. It is true, the comparative _might_ here have been used; but the superlative is clearer, and more agreeable to custom. And how can "_largest_" be wrong, if "_first_" is right? "Let Dick's be the _larger_, because he spoke _sooner_," borders too much upon a different idea, that of _proportion_; as when we say, "_The sooner the better_,"--"_The more the merrier_." So Blair: "When only two things are compared, the comparative degree should be used, and not the superlative."--_Practical Gram._, p. 81. "A Trochee has the _first_ syllable accented, and the _last_ unaccented."--_Ib._, p. 118. "An Iambus has the first syllable unaccented, and the _last_ accented."--_Ibid._ These two examples are found also in _Jamieson's Rhetoric_, p. 305; _Murray's Gram._, p. 253; _Kirkham's_, 219; _Bullions's_, 169; _Guy's_, 120; _Merchant's_, 166. So Hiley: "When _two_ persons or things are compared, the _comparative_ degree must be employed. When _three or more_ persons or things are compared, the _superlative_ must be used."--_Treatise on English Gram._, p. 78. Contradiction in practice: "Thomas is _wiser_ than his brothers."--_Ib._, p. 79. Are not "_three or more persons_" here compared by "the comparative" _wiser_? "In an _Iambus_ the _first_ syllable is unaccented."--_Ib._, p. 123. An iambus has but _two_ syllables; and this author expressly teaches that "_first_" is "superlative."--_Ib._, p. 21. So Sanborn: "The _positive_ degree denotes the _simple_ form of an adjective _without_ any variation of meaning. The _comparative_ degree increases or lessens the meaning _of the positive_, and denotes a comparison _between two_ persons or things. The _superlative_ degree increases or lessens the positive _to the greatest extent_, and denotes a comparison _between more than two_ persons or things."--_Analytical Gram._, p. 30 and p. 86. These pretended definitions
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568  
569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

superlative

 

things

 

degree

 
persons
 
comparative
 

compared

 
syllable
 

denotes

 

positive

 

unaccented


larger
 

sooner

 

definitions

 

largest

 

accented

 
Iambus
 

practice

 

lessens

 

meaning

 
Maunder

comparison

 
increases
 

Merchant

 

examples

 

Jamieson

 

Rhetoric

 

Bullions

 
Kirkham
 

Murray

 

brothers


adjective

 

simple

 

Sanborn

 

teaches

 

variation

 

pretended

 

Analytical

 

greatest

 

extent

 

expressly


author

 

Contradiction

 

Thomas

 

English

 

Treatise

 

syllables

 
iambus
 

employed

 

improper

 

Deborah