FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561  
562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   >>   >|  
the end of them:" all of which is grossly absurd. (8.) The repetition of the word _degree_, in saying, "The superlative _degree_ increases or lessens the positive to the highest or lowest _degree_," is a disagreeable tautology. Besides, unless it involves the additional error of presenting the same word in different senses, it makes one degree swell or diminish an other _to itself_; whereas, in the very next sentence, this singular agency is forgotten, and a second equally strange takes its place: "The positive _becomes_ the superlative by adding _st_ or _est_, to the end of it;" i. e., to the end of _itself_. Nothing can be more ungrammatical, than is much of the language by which grammar itself is now professedly taught! OBS. 5.--It has been almost universally assumed by grammarians, that the positive degree is _the only standard_ to which the other degrees can refer; though many seem to think, that the superlative always implies or includes the comparative, and is consequently inapplicable when only two things are spoken of. Neither of these positions is involved in any of the definitions which I have given above. The reader may think what he will about these points, after observing the several ways in which each form may be used. In the phrases, "_greater_ than Solomon,"--"_more_ than a bushel,"--"_later_ than one o'clock," it is not immediately obvious that the positives _great, much_, and _late_, are the real terms of contrast. And how is it in the Latin phrases, "_Dulcior melle_, sweeter than honey,"--"_Praestantior auro_, better than gold?" These authors will resolve all such phrases thus: "_greater_, than Solomon _was great_,"--"_more_, than a bushel _is much_," &c. As the conjunction _than_ never governs the objective case, it seems necessary to suppose an ellipsis of some verb after the noun which follows it as above; and possibly the foregoing solution, uncouth as it seems, may, for the English idiom, be the true one: as, "My Father is _greater than I_."--_John_, xiv, 28. That is, "My Father is greater _than I am_;"--or, perhaps, "than I am _great_." But if it appear that _some_ degree of the same quality must always be contrasted with the comparative, there is still room to question whether this degree must always be that which we call the positive. Cicero, in exile, wrote to his wife: "Ego autem hoc _miserior_ sum, quam tu, quae es _miserrima_, quod ipsa calamitas communis est utriusque nostrum, sed culpa m
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561  
562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

degree

 

positive

 

greater

 
superlative
 
phrases
 

Father

 
Solomon
 

bushel

 

comparative

 

suppose


ellipsis
 

repetition

 

conjunction

 

governs

 

objective

 
uncouth
 

English

 

solution

 

foregoing

 
possibly

Dulcior

 
sweeter
 

contrast

 

Praestantior

 

resolve

 

authors

 

absurd

 
nostrum
 

Cicero

 

miserior


calamitas

 

communis

 

miserrima

 

grossly

 

question

 

quality

 

contrasted

 

utriusque

 

obvious

 

grammar


professedly

 

taught

 

universally

 

assumed

 

degrees

 

standard

 
grammarians
 

senses

 

language

 

strange