FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366  
367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   >>   >|  
l. xlvi.). [133] Sir Charles Tupper, Ibid., 13th May 1898. [134] In 1898, $3,527,810: in 1902, $3,888,126. [135] "It is ordered that notice be given that Richard Fairbanks his house in Boston is the place appointed for all letters which are brought from beyond the seas or are to be sent thither to be left with him, and he is to take care that they are to be delivered or sent according to the directions; and he is allowed for every letter a penny, and must answer all miscarriages through his own negligence in this kind." [136] Stanley I. Slack, _A Brief History of the Postal Service_, Omaha. [137] M. E. Woolley, _Early History of the Colonial Post Office_, Providence, R.I., 1894, p. 6. [138] New York, in 1692, enacted that any persons or body politic or corporate other than the Postmaster-General presuming to "carry, re-carry, or deliver letters for hire, or to set up or imploy any foot-post, horse-post, or pacquet-boat whatsoever" for the carrying of letters or packets should forfeit [L]100; and the Act of New Hampshire, passed in 1693, provided that no person or persons whatsoever should carry letters for hire, "except letters sent by private friend or by any messenger for or concerning the private affaires of any person." [139] Preamble of Act (1st April 1693). [140] "The mail carriers rode through the wilderness in this year of the beginning."--Stanley I. Slack, _A Brief History of the Postal Service_, Omaha, p. 11. [141] See _infra_, Appendix B, pp. 391 ff. [142] "An Act for establishing a General Post Office for all her Majesty's Dominions" (9 Anne, cap. 10). [143] 5 Geo. III, cap. 25. See _supra_, pp. 38-9. [144] Cf. _supra_, p. 38. [145] Evidence of Benjamin Franklin before House of Commons Committee, 28th January 1766. The Committee were, of course, most anxious on points having relation to the taxation of the colonies by the English Parliament, and Dr. Franklin was asked questions directed to discovering whether the colonists regarded postage, which was fixed by Act of the British Parliament, and had been newly fixed by such Act in the previous year (5 Geo. III, cap. 25), as a tax. On this point Dr. Franklin emphatically held that the postage paid on a letter was not of the nature of a tax, but that it was simply payment for service performed; and, moreover, the payment of postage was not compulsory, since a man might still, as before the passing of the Act, send his letter by a ser
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366  
367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letters

 

Franklin

 
postage
 

letter

 

History

 
Stanley
 
Postal
 
Office
 

persons

 

General


Service
 

person

 

Committee

 
Parliament
 
private
 
payment
 
whatsoever
 

Commons

 

Evidence

 
Benjamin

January

 

anxious

 

points

 

relation

 

establishing

 
Majesty
 

notice

 

Dominions

 

ordered

 

taxation


English

 

simply

 
nature
 

emphatically

 

service

 

performed

 

passing

 
compulsory
 

questions

 

directed


discovering

 

Appendix

 

colonists

 

regarded

 

previous

 
Tupper
 
Charles
 

British

 

colonies

 

enacted