FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  
oses_. It was once a man or a woman, and has been changed to bird or beast by a god or a magician. Men, again, have originally been beasts, in his philosophy, and are descended from wolves, frogs, or serpents, or monkeys. The heavenly bodies are traced to precisely the same sort of origin; and hence, we conclude, come their strange animal names, and the strange myths about them which appear in all ancient poetry. These names, in turn, have curiously affected human beliefs. Astrology is based on the opinion that a man's character and fate are determined by the stars under which he is born. And the nature of these stars is deduced from their names, so that the bear should have been found in the horoscope of Dr. Johnson. When Giordano Bruno wrote his satire against religion, the famous 'Spaccio della bestia trionfante,' he proposed to banish not only the gods but the beasts from heaven. He would call the stars, not the _Bear_, or the _Swan_, or the _Pleiades_, but Truth, Mercy, Justice, and so forth, that men might be born, not under bestial, but moral influences. But the beasts have had too long possession of the stars to be easily dislodged, and the tenure of the _Bear_ and the _Swan_ will probably last as long as there is a science of Astronomy. Their names are not likely again to delude a philosopher into the opinion of Aristotle that the stars are animated. This argument had been worked out to the writer's satisfaction when he chanced to light on Mr. Max Mueller's explanation of the name of the _Great Bear_. We have explained that name as only one out of countless similar appellations which men of every race give to the stars. These names, again, we have accounted for as the result of savage philosophy, which takes no great distinction between man and the things in the world, and looks on stars, beasts, birds, fishes, flowers, and trees as men and women in disguise. Mr. Mueller's theory is based on philological considerations. He thinks that the name of the _Great Bear_ is the result of a mistake as to the meaning of words. There was in Sanskrit, he says,[155] a root _ark_, or _arch_, meaning 'to be bright.' She-stars are called _riksha_, that is, bright ones, in the Veda. 'The constellations here called the Rikshas, in the sense of the "bright ones," would be homonymous in Sanskrit with the Bears. Remember also that, apparently without rhyme or reason, the same constellation is called by Greeks and Romans the Bear..
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

beasts

 

called

 
bright
 
result
 
meaning
 

Sanskrit

 

opinion

 

Mueller

 

strange

 

philosophy


Astronomy
 

explained

 

similar

 
appellations
 

countless

 

delude

 
science
 

worked

 

writer

 

chanced


satisfaction

 

argument

 

accounted

 

explanation

 

Aristotle

 

animated

 

philosopher

 

fishes

 

constellation

 

riksha


constellations

 

apparently

 

reason

 

Remember

 

Rikshas

 

homonymous

 
mistake
 

things

 
Romans
 

distinction


savage

 

theory

 

philological

 

considerations

 

thinks

 

disguise

 

Greeks

 

flowers

 

animal

 

origin