FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  
, I. 42, quoting a MS. entitled _Petrus Ciera S. R. E. Card, de Origine Venetorum et de Civitate Venetiarum_. Cicogna says he could not find this MS. as it had been carried to England; and then breaks into a diatribe against foreigners who purchase and carry away such treasures, "not to make a serious study of them, but for mere vain-glory ... or in order to write books contradicting the very MSS. that they have bought, and with that dishonesty and untruth which are so notorious!" (IV. 227.) [2] _Campidoglio Veneto_ of Cappellari (MS. in St. Mark's Lib.), quoting "the Venetian Annals of Giulio Faroldi." [3] The _Genealogies_ of Marco Barbaro specify 1033 as the year of the migration to Venice; on what authority does not appear (MS. copy in _Museo Civico_ at Venice). [4] _Cappellari_, u.s., and _Barbaro_. In the same century we find (1125, 1195) indications of Polos at Torcello, and of others (1160) at Equileo, and (1179, 1206) Lido Maggiore; in 1154 a Marco Polo of Rialto. Contemporary with these is a family of Polos (1139, 1183, 1193, 1201) at Chioggia (_Documents and Lists of Documents from various Archives at_ Venice). [5] See Appendix C, Nos. 4, 5, and 16. It was supposed that an autograph of Marco as member of the Great Council had been discovered, but this proves to be a mistake, as will be explained further on (see p. 74, note). In those days the demarcation between Patrician and non-Patrician at Venice, where all classes shared in commerce, all were (generally speaking) of one race, and where there were neither castles, domains, nor trains of horsemen, formed no wide gulf. Still it is interesting to establish the verity of the old tradition of Marco's technical nobility. [6] Marco's seniority rests only on the assertion of Ramusio, who also calls Maffeo older than Nicolo. But in Marco the Elder's Will these two are always (3 times) specified as "_Nicolaus et Matheus_." [7] This seems implied in the Elder Marco's Will (1280): "_Item de bonis quae me habere contingunt_ de fraterna Compagnia _a suprascriptis Nicolao et Matheo Paulo_," etc. [8] In his Will he terms himself "Ego Marcus Polo quondam de Constantinopoli." [9] There is no real ground for doubt as to this. All the extant MSS. agree in making Marco fifteen years old when his father returned to Venice in 1269. [10] Bald
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Venice

 

Patrician

 

Documents

 
Barbaro
 

Cappellari

 

quoting

 
castles
 

generally

 

making

 
domains

speaking

 

extant

 

interesting

 

ground

 

horsemen

 

commerce

 

formed

 

trains

 

classes

 

explained


mistake

 

Council

 

discovered

 

proves

 

father

 

fifteen

 

establish

 

returned

 
demarcation
 

shared


implied
 
Marcus
 
Nicolaus
 

Matheus

 

Compagnia

 

fraterna

 

suprascriptis

 

Nicolao

 

Matheo

 

contingunt


habere

 

seniority

 

assertion

 

Ramusio

 

nobility

 

tradition

 

technical

 

Constantinopoli

 

member

 
quondam