FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377  
378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   >>  
. B. Rye's _England as seen by Foreigners_, pp. 117-124). {234} At the Bodleian Library (MS. Rawlinson, A 204) are the original accounts of Lord Stanhope of Harrington, Treasurer of the Chamber for various (detached) years in the early part of James I's reign. These documents show that Shakespeare's company acted at Court on November 1 and 4, December 26 and 28, 1604, and on January 7 and 8, February 2 and 3, and the evenings of the following Shrove Sunday, Shrove Monday, and Shrove Tuesday, 1605. {235} These dates are drawn from a memorandum of plays performed at Court in 1604 and 1605 which is among Malone's manuscripts in the Bodleian Library, and was obviously derived by Malone from authentic documents that were in his day preserved at the Audit Office in Somerset House. The document cannot now be traced at the Public Record Office, whither the Audit Office papers have been removed since Malone's death. Peter Cunningham professed to print the original document in his accounts of the revels at Court (Shakespeare Society, 1842, pp. 203 _et seq._), but there is no doubt that he forged his so-called transcript, and that the additions which he made to Malone's memorandum were the outcome of his fancy. Collier's assertion in his _New Particulars_, p. 57, that _Othello_ was first acted at Sir Thomas Egerton's residence at Harefield on August 6, 1602, was based solely on a document among the Earl of Ellesmere's MSS. at Bridgwater House, which purported to be a contemporary account by the clerk, Sir Arthur Maynwaring, of Sir Thomas Egerton's household expenses. This document, which Collier reprinted in his _Egerton Papers_ (Camden Soc.), p. 343, was authoritatively pronounced by experts in 1860 to be 'a shameful forgery' (cf. Ingleby's _Complete View of the Shakspere Controversy_, 1861, pp. 261-5). {237} Dr. Garnett's _Italian Literature_, 1898, p. 227. {239} Cf. Letter by Mrs. Stopes in _Athenaeum_, July 25, 1896. {240} Cf. _Macbeth_, ed. Clark and Wright, Clarendon Press Series. {241a} This fact is stated on the title-page of the quartos. {241b} Sidney tells the story in a chapter entitled 'The pitiful state and story of the Paphlagonian unkind king and his blind son; first related by the son, then by his blind father' (bk. ii. chap. 10, ed. 1590 4to; pp. 132-3, ed. 1674, fol.) {242} It was edited for the Shakespeare Society in 1842 by Dyce, who owned the manuscript. {245} Mr. George Wyndham
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377  
378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   >>  



Top keywords:

Malone

 

document

 

Office

 
Egerton
 

Shrove

 
Shakespeare
 

Collier

 
Thomas
 

Society

 
memorandum

Bodleian

 
original
 
accounts
 
documents
 

Library

 
Ingleby
 

forgery

 

experts

 

pronounced

 
shameful

edited

 

Garnett

 
authoritatively
 

Shakspere

 

Controversy

 

Complete

 

George

 

contemporary

 

account

 

Wyndham


purported

 

Ellesmere

 

Bridgwater

 
manuscript
 

Papers

 

reprinted

 
Camden
 

Italian

 
expenses
 

Arthur


Maynwaring

 
household
 

Series

 
stated
 

Clarendon

 

Wright

 
related
 

chapter

 

entitled

 

pitiful