FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977  
978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   >>   >|  
its work to date, and presented its special plea for cotton-cloth filters as the ideal coffee-making device. This booklet aroused considerable discussion, particularly between those who favored the paper filter and those who, with Mr. Aborn, believed cotton cloth, such as muslin, to be the most efficient strainer. "Cotton", argued Mr. Aborn, "is an ideal sanitary strainer because it contains no chemical or questionable manufacturing element." It was pointed out by Dr. Floyd W. Robison that while cotton cloth, such as muslin, does give a fairly clear coffee, it is not so clear as by the methods where a filter paper is used. He said: Both methods have serious objectionable features. The muslin bag, particularly, is decidedly unsanitary, especially when used in restaurants and hotels. It is rarely kept clean, and one who has frequented restaurants and many hotel kitchens knows that it lends itself to very unclean and unsightly methods of handling. The food inspector has to check this up perhaps as often as any one feature about a restaurant. The objection to the filter paper is not at all on the ground of sanitation. It is ideal in this respect. The claim is made, and at least, in part, substantiated, that it does hold back valuable features of the brew. There are many points about the filter that have not been considered at all. Mr. Calkin believes that the very best type of filter is a bed of coffee itself, and I must say this has the sanction of good laboratory experience. I.D. Richheimer[380], attacking the cotton cloth filter, said: It is a known fact that the fats in coffee are very dense and represent twelve to fifteen percent of the coffee weight. These fats--due to the simplest chemical action of contact with air, moisture and continued heat--begin a fermentation in the completed beverage. In the cloth-filtering process--due to the rapid passage of water through grounds almost as quickly as poured--the largest percentage of fats is carried into the beverage. Fat being lighter than water rises to the top of water if given a certain amount of time during the brewing process. Were there no fats (which ferment) in coffee there would be no need for placing cloth-filtering material under water, as suggested, to keep them from becoming sour. In the booklet referred to, M
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977  
978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

filter

 

coffee

 

cotton

 

muslin

 

methods

 

booklet

 
process
 

features

 
chemical
 

filtering


restaurants

 
beverage
 
strainer
 
moisture
 

considered

 
contact
 

believes

 
action
 

Calkin

 

simplest


fifteen
 

attacking

 

continued

 

Richheimer

 

sanction

 

laboratory

 

experience

 

percent

 
weight
 

twelve


represent

 

grounds

 

brewing

 

ferment

 

amount

 

referred

 

suggested

 

placing

 
material
 
passage

fermentation
 

completed

 
quickly
 
poured
 

lighter

 
largest
 

percentage

 

carried

 

element

 
pointed