FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327  
328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>   >|  
facie in Orbe Luna_, cap. vii.] [Footnote 454: See Augustine, _De civitate Dei_, xvi. 9; Lactantius, _Inst. Div._, iii. 23; Jerome, _Comm. in Ezechiel_, i. 6; Whewell's _History of the Inductive Sciences_, vol i. p. 196.] [Footnote 455: See above, p. 266.] [Footnote 456: For an account of the cosmography of the Divine Comedy, illustrated with interesting diagrams, see Artaud de Montor, _Histoire de Dante Alighieri_, Paris, 1841.] [Footnote 457: It was first printed without indication of place or date, but probably the place was Paris and the date somewhere from 1483 to 1490. Manuscript copies were very common, and Columbus probably knew the book long before that time. There is a good account of it in Humboldt's _Examen critique_, tom. i. pp. 61-76, 96-108. Humboldt thinks that such knowledge as Columbus had of the opinions of ancient writers was chiefly if not wholly obtained from Alliacus. It is doubtful if Columbus had any direct acquaintance with the works of Roger Bacon, but he knew the _Liber Cosmographicus_ of Albertus Magnus and the _Speculum Naturale_ of Vincent de Beauvais (both about 1250), and drew encouragement from them. He also knew the book of Mandeville, first printed in French at Lyons in 1480, and a Latin translation of Marco Polo, published in 1485, a copy of which, with marginal MS. notes, is now in the Colombina.] [Illustration: Annotations by Columbus.] [Sidenote: Ancient estimates of the size of the globe and the length of the Oecumene.] The principal consideration, of course, was the distance to be traversed; and here Columbus was helped by an error which he shared with many geographers of his day. He somewhat underestimated the size of the earth, and at the same time greatly overestimated the length of Asia. The first astronomer to calculate, by scientific methods, the circumference of our planet at the equator was Eratosthenes (B. C. 276-196), and he came--all things considered--fairly near the truth; he made it 25,200 geographical miles (of ten stadia), or about one seventh too great. The true figure is 21,600 geographical miles, equivalent to 24,899 English statute miles.[458] Curiously enough, Posidonius, in revising this calculation a century later, redu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327  
328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Columbus

 

Footnote

 
printed
 

length

 

account

 
Humboldt
 
geographical
 
Oecumene
 

Posidonius

 

Sidenote


estimates
 

Curiously

 

Ancient

 
helped
 
shared
 
traversed
 
principal
 

consideration

 

distance

 
revising

Illustration

 

translation

 

century

 

Mandeville

 

French

 
published
 

Colombina

 

statute

 

marginal

 

calculation


Annotations

 

planet

 
equator
 

circumference

 

stadia

 

scientific

 

methods

 
Eratosthenes
 

things

 

considered


fairly

 

figure

 

geographers

 

equivalent

 

underestimated

 
astronomer
 
calculate
 

seventh

 

greatly

 

overestimated