s set forth by
Wilhelm von Humboldt; with the translation of an unpublished Memoir
by him on the American Verb. pp. 51. In _Proceedings_ of the
American Philosophical Society, 1885.

2. On Polysynthesis and Incorporation as characteristics of
American Languages. pp. 41. In _Proceedings_ of the American
Philosophical Society, 1885.

3. Characteristics of American Languages. _American Antiquarian_,
January, 1894.

4. On certain morphologic traits in American Languages. _American
Antiquarian_, October, 1894.

5. On various supposed relations between the American and Asiatic
Races. _Memoirs_ of the International Congress of Anthropology,
1893.

6. The Present Status of American Linguistics. _Memoirs_ of the
International Congress of Anthropology, 1893.

7. American Languages and why we should Study them. An address
delivered before the Pennsylvania Historical Society. pp. 23. In
_Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography_, 1885.

8. The Rate of Change in American Languages. In _Science_, Vol. X.,
1887.

9. Traits of Primitive Speech, illustrated from American languages.
In _Proceedings_ of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, August, 1888.

10. The Language of Palaeolithic Man. pp. 14. In _Proceedings_ of
the American Philosophical Society, October, 1888.

11. The American Race: A Linguistic Classification and Ethnographic
Description of the Native Tribes of North and South America. pp.
392. New York, 1891.

12. The Standard Dictionary (Indian Words in). New York, 1894.

13. Aboriginal American Authors and their Productions, especially
those in the Native Languages. pp. 63. Philadelphia, 1883.

14. American Aboriginal Poetry. pp. 21. In _Proceedings_ of the
Numismatic and Antiquarian Society of Philadelphia, 1883.

15. The Conception of Love in some American Languages. pp. 18. In
_Proceedings_ of the American Philosophical Society, November,
1886.

The earlier numbers, (1-4,) in the above list are occupied with the
inquiry whether the native American languages, as a group, have peculiar
morphological traits, which justify their classification as one of the
great divisions of human speech. In this question, I have been a
disciple of Wilhelm von Humboldt and Professor H. Steinthal, and have
argued that th