FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379  
380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   >>   >|  
idence that at Turin seeds of _T. pendula_ have reproduced the parent-form, _T. orientalis_.[771] Every one must have noticed how certain individual trees regularly put forth and shed their leaves earlier or later than others of the same species. There is a famous horse-chesnut in the Tuileries which is named from {363} leafing so much earlier than the others. There is also an oak near Edinburgh which retains its leaves to a very late period. These differences have been attributed by some authors to the nature of the soil in which the trees grow; but Archbishop Whately grafted an early thorn on a late one, and _vice versa_, and both grafts kept to their proper periods, which differed by about a fortnight, as if they still grew on their own stocks.[772] There is a Cornish variety of the elm which is almost an evergreen, and is so tender that the shoots are often killed by the frost; and the varieties of the Turkish oak (_Q. cerris_) may be arranged as deciduous, sub-evergreen, and evergreen.[773] _Scotch Fir_ (_Pinus sylvestris_).--I allude to this tree as it bears on the question of the greater variability of our hedgerow trees compared with those under strictly natural conditions. A well-informed writer[774] states that the Scotch fir presents few varieties in its native Scotch forests; but that it "varies much in figure and foliage, and in the size, shape, and colour of its cones, when several generations have been produced away from its native locality." There is little doubt that the highland and lowland varieties differ in the value of their timber, and that they can be propagated truly by seed; thus justifying Loudon's remark, that "a variety is often of as much importance as a species, and sometimes far more so."[775] I may mention one rather important point in which this tree occasionally varies; in the classification of the Coniferae, sections are founded on whether two, three, or five leaves are included in the same sheath; the Scotch fir has properly only two leaves thus enclosed, but specimens have been observed with groups of three leaves in a sheath.[776] Besides these differences in the semi-cultivated Scotch fir, there are in several parts of Europe natural or geographical races, which have been ranked by some authors as distinct species.[777] Loudon[778] considers _P.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379  
380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Scotch

 

leaves

 
species
 

varieties

 

evergreen

 

Loudon

 

variety

 

authors

 

natural

 

differences


varies
 

earlier

 
native
 

sheath

 

generations

 

highland

 

lowland

 

produced

 

strictly

 

locality


differ
 

informed

 

forests

 

figure

 

considers

 

presents

 

writer

 

foliage

 
colour
 
conditions

states

 
distinct
 

ranked

 

enclosed

 

properly

 
included
 
specimens
 

cultivated

 
Europe
 
observed

groups

 
Besides
 
founded
 

remark

 
importance
 
justifying
 

timber

 

propagated

 
geographical
 

occasionally