FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924  
925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   >>   >|  
took the whole, so as even to become intoxicated thereby." But this could not happen if the sacramental species did not nourish. Therefore the sacramental species do nourish. _I answer that,_ This question presents no difficulty, now that we have solved the preceding question. Because, as stated in _De Anima_ ii, food nourishes by being converted into the substance of the individual nourished. Now it has been stated (A. 5) that the sacramental species can be converted into a substance generated from them. And they can be converted into the human body for the same reason as they can into ashes or worms. Consequently, it is evident that they nourish. But the senses witness to the untruth of what some maintain; viz. that the species do not nourish as though they were changed into the human body, but merely refresh and hearten by acting upon the senses (as a man is heartened by the odor of meat, and intoxicated by the fumes of wine). Because such refreshment does not suffice long for a man, whose body needs repair owing to constant waste: and yet a man could be supported for long if he were to take hosts and consecrated wine in great quantity. In like manner the statement advanced by others cannot stand, who hold that the sacramental species nourish owing to the remaining substantial form of the bread and wine: both because the form does not remain, as stated above (Q. 75, A. 6): and because to nourish is the act not of a form but rather of matter, which takes the form of the one nourished, while the form of the nourishment passes away: hence it is said in _De Anima_ ii that nourishment is at first unlike, but at the end is like. Reply Obj. 1: After the consecration bread can be said to be in this sacrament in two ways. First, as to the species, which retain the name of the previous substance, as Gregory says in an Easter Homily (Lanfranc, De Corp. et Sang. Dom. xx). Secondly, Christ's very body can be called bread, since it is the mystical bread "coming down from heaven." Consequently, Ambrose uses the word "bread" in this second meaning, when he says that "this bread does not pass into the body," because, to wit, Christ's body is not changed into man's body, but nourishes his soul. But he is not speaking of bread taken in the first acceptation. Reply Obj. 2: Although the sacramental species are not those things out of which the human body is made, yet they are changed into those things stated above. Reply O
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924  
925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

species

 

nourish

 
sacramental
 

stated

 

changed

 

converted

 

substance

 
Consequently
 

Christ

 

things


nourishment

 

senses

 

nourished

 

question

 
nourishes
 

Because

 

intoxicated

 

consecration

 

sacrament

 

Easter


Homily

 

Gregory

 
previous
 
retain
 
unlike
 

matter

 
Therefore
 

passes

 
Lanfranc
 
happen

speaking
 

meaning

 
acceptation
 
Although
 

Secondly

 

called

 
heaven
 
Ambrose
 

coming

 
mystical

answer

 

refresh

 

preceding

 

maintain

 

hearten

 

acting

 
heartened
 

solved

 
untruth
 

individual