FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969  
970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   >>   >|  
onsequently, no one is forbidden to behold Christ's body, when once he has received Christ's sacrament, namely, Baptism: whereas the non-baptized are not to be allowed even to see this sacrament, as is clear from Dionysius (Eccl. Hier. vii). But only those are to be allowed to share in the eating who are united with Christ not merely sacramentally, but likewise really. Reply Obj. 5: The fact of a man being unconscious of his sin can come about in two ways. First of all through his own fault, either because through ignorance of the law (which ignorance does not excuse him), he thinks something not to be sinful which is a sin, as for example if one guilty of fornication were to deem simple fornication not to be a mortal sin; or because he neglects to examine his conscience, which is opposed to what the Apostle says (1 Cor. 11:28): "Let a man prove himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice." And in this way nevertheless the sinner who receives Christ's body commits sin, although unconscious thereof, because the very ignorance is a sin on his part. Secondly, it may happen without fault on his part, as, for instance, when he has sorrowed over his sin, but is not sufficiently contrite: and in such a case he does not sin in receiving the body of Christ, because a man cannot know for certain whether he is truly contrite. It suffices, however, if he find in himself the marks of contrition, for instance, if he "grieve over past sins," and "propose to avoid them in the future" [*Cf. Rule of Augustine]. But if he be ignorant that what he did was a sinful act, through ignorance of the fact, which excuses, for instance, if a man approach a woman whom he believed to be his wife whereas she was not, he is not to be called a sinner on that account; in the same way if he has utterly forgotten his sin, general contrition suffices for blotting it out, as will be said hereafter (Suppl., Q. 2, A. 3, ad 2); hence he is no longer to be called a sinner. _______________________ FIFTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 80, Art. 5] Whether to Approach This Sacrament with Consciousness of Sin Is the Gravest of All Sins? Objection 1: It seems that to approach this sacrament with consciousness of sin is the gravest of all sins; because the Apostle says (1 Cor. 11:27): "Whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord": upon which the gloss observ
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969  
970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christ

 

ignorance

 
instance
 

sinner

 

sacrament

 

Apostle

 

sinful

 
guilty
 

fornication

 

approach


contrition

 

called

 

suffices

 

chalice

 
contrite
 

allowed

 

unconscious

 

believed

 

baptized

 

account


blotting

 

general

 
forgotten
 
utterly
 
excuses
 

observ

 
propose
 

grieve

 
future
 
ignorant

Augustine
 

Consciousness

 
Sacrament
 
Approach
 

Baptism

 

Gravest

 
consciousness
 
gravest
 

Objection

 
Whosoever

Whether

 

received

 

ARTICLE

 

unworthily

 

longer

 

examine

 
conscience
 

opposed

 
neglects
 

mortal