FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000  
1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   >>   >|  
han that of a man baptizing. Therefore, several priests cannot consecrate one host at the same time. Obj. 2: Further, what can be done by one, is superfluously done by several. But there ought to be nothing superfluous in the sacraments. Since, then, one is sufficient for consecrating, it seems that several cannot consecrate one host. Obj. 3: Further, as Augustine says (Tract. xxvi in Joan.), this is "the sacrament of unity." But multitude seems to be opposed to unity. Therefore it seems inconsistent with the sacrament for several priests to consecrate the same host. _On the contrary,_ It is the custom of some Churches for priests newly ordained to co-celebrate with the bishop ordaining them. _I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), when a priest is ordained he is placed on a level with those who received consecrating power from our Lord at the Supper. And therefore, according to the custom of some Churches, as the apostles supped when Christ supped, so the newly ordained co-celebrate with the ordaining bishop. Nor is the consecration, on that account, repeated over the same host, because as Innocent III says (De Sacr. Alt. Myst. iv), the intention of all should be directed to the same instant of the consecration. Reply Obj. 1: We do not read of Christ baptizing with the apostles when He committed to them the duty of baptizing; consequently there is no parallel. Reply Obj. 2: If each individual priest were acting in his own power, then other celebrants would be superfluous, since one would be sufficient. But whereas the priest does not consecrate except as in Christ's stead; and since many are "one in Christ" (Gal. 3:28); consequently it does not matter whether this sacrament be consecrated by one or by many, except that the rite of the Church must be observed. Reply Obj. 3: The Eucharist is the sacrament of ecclesiastical unity, which is brought about by many being "one in Christ." _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 82, Art. 3] Whether Dispensing of This Sacrament Belongs to a Priest Alone? Objection 1: It seems that the dispensing of this sacrament does not belong to a priest alone. For Christ's blood belongs to this sacrament no less than His body. But Christ's blood is dispensed by deacons: hence the blessed Lawrence said to the blessed Sixtus (Office of St. Lawrence, Resp. at Matins): "Try whether you have chosen a fit minister, to whom you have entrusted the dispensing of the L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000  
1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christ

 

sacrament

 
priest
 

consecrate

 

ordained

 

baptizing

 

priests

 
Churches
 

ordaining

 

bishop


custom

 

consecration

 

dispensing

 

apostles

 
supped
 

celebrate

 

consecrating

 

Further

 

superfluous

 

sufficient


Therefore

 

blessed

 
Lawrence
 
Eucharist
 
observed
 

ecclesiastical

 
brought
 

Church

 
entrusted
 
minister

matter
 

chosen

 
consecrated
 
belongs
 

dispensed

 

deacons

 
celebrants
 
Office
 

Sixtus

 
Whether

Dispensing

 

ARTICLE

 

Sacrament

 

Objection

 

belong

 

Matins

 
Belongs
 

Priest

 
stated
 

answer