FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001  
1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   >>   >|  
ord's blood." Therefore, with equal reason the dispensing of Christ's body does not belong to priests only. Obj. 2: Further, priests are the appointed ministers of the sacraments. But this sacrament is completed in the consecration of the matter, and not in the use, to which the dispensing belongs. Therefore it seems that it does not belong to a priest to dispense the Lord's body. Obj. 3: Further, Dionysius says (Eccl. Hier. iii, iv) that this sacrament, like chrism, has the power of perfecting. But it belongs, not to priests, but to bishops, to sign with the chrism. Therefore likewise, to dispense this sacrament belongs to the bishop and not to the priest. _On the contrary,_ It is written (De Consecr., dist. 12): "It has come to our knowledge that some priests deliver the Lord's body to a layman or to a woman to carry it to the sick: The synod therefore forbids such presumption to continue; and let the priest himself communicate the sick." _I answer that,_ The dispensing of Christ's body belongs to the priest for three reasons. First, because, as was said above (A. 1), he consecrates as in the person of Christ. But as Christ consecrated His body at the supper, so also He gave it to others to be partaken of by them. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christ's body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing belong to him. Secondly, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people; hence as it belongs to him to offer the people's gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver consecrated gifts to the people. Thirdly, because out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands, for touching this sacrament. Hence it is not lawful for anyone else to touch it except from necessity, for instance, if it were to fall upon the ground, or else in some other case of urgency. Reply Obj. 1: The deacon, as being nigh to the priestly order, has a certain share in the latter's duties, so that he may dispense the blood; but not the body, except in case of necessity, at the bidding of a bishop or of a priest. First of all, because Christ's blood is contained in a vessel, hence there is no need for it to be touched by the dispenser, as Christ's body is touched. Secondly, because the blood denotes the redemption derived by the people from Christ; hence it is that water is mi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001  
1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christ

 

priest

 
belongs
 

sacrament

 

dispensing

 

consecrated

 

people

 
priests
 

dispense

 

Therefore


likewise

 

belong

 

bishop

 

necessity

 
deliver
 

chrism

 

touched

 

appointed

 

consecration

 

Secondly


Further

 

touching

 
intermediary
 
touches
 
lawful
 

reverence

 
Thirdly
 

corporal

 
Accordingly
 
chalice

contained
 

vessel

 
bidding
 
duties
 

derived

 

redemption

 
denotes
 
dispenser
 

ground

 
instance

urgency

 

priestly

 

deacon

 

perfecting

 

bishops

 

Consecr

 
written
 

contrary

 
ministers
 

reason