FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012  
1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   >>   >|  
of the Faith are not to receive the sacrament from their dispensing. Reply Obj. 3: Although fornication is not graver than other sins, yet men are more prone to it, owing to fleshly concupiscence. Consequently, this sin is specially inhibited to priests by the Church, lest anyone hear the mass of one living in concubinage. However, this is to be understood of one who is notorious, either from being convicted and sentenced, or from having acknowledged his guilt in legal form, or from it being impossible to conceal his guilt by any subterfuge. _______________________ TENTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 82, Art. 10] Whether It Is Lawful for a Priest to Refrain Entirely from Consecrating the Eucharist? Objection 1: It seems to be lawful for a priest to refrain entirely from consecrating the Eucharist. Because, as it is the priest's office to consecrate the Eucharist, so it is likewise to baptize and administer the other sacraments. But the priest is not bound to act as a minister of the other sacraments, unless he has undertaken the care of souls. Therefore, it seems that likewise he is not bound to consecrate the Eucharist except he be charged with the care of souls. Obj. 2: Further, no one is bound to do what is unlawful for him to do; otherwise he would be in two minds. But it is not lawful for the priest who is in a state of sin, or excommunicate, to consecrate the Eucharist, as was said above (A. 7). Therefore it seems that such men are not bound to celebrate, and so neither are the others; otherwise they would be gainers by their fault. Obj. 3: Further, the priestly dignity is not lost by subsequent weakness: because Pope Gelasius I says (cf. Decretal, Dist. 55): "As the canonical precepts do not permit them who are feeble in body to approach the priesthood, so if anyone be disabled when once in that state, he cannot lose that he received at the time he was well." But it sometimes happens that those who are already ordained as priests incur defects whereby they are hindered from celebrating, such as leprosy or epilepsy, or the like. Consequently, it does not appear that priests are bound to celebrate. _On the contrary,_ Ambrose says in one of his Orations (xxxiii): "It is a grave matter if we do not approach Thy altar with clean heart and pure hands; but it is graver still if while shunning sins we also fail to offer our sacrifice." _I answer that,_ Some have said that a priest may lawfully refrain altogether
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012  
1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

priest

 

Eucharist

 
priests
 

consecrate

 

likewise

 

approach

 

refrain

 
lawful
 

sacraments

 

Therefore


Further

 

Consequently

 

graver

 

celebrate

 
gainers
 

dignity

 

disabled

 

priesthood

 

priestly

 

weakness


Gelasius

 

Decretal

 
canonical
 
subsequent
 
permit
 

precepts

 
feeble
 

xxxiii

 
matter
 
shunning

lawfully
 

altogether

 
answer
 
sacrifice
 

Orations

 

Ambrose

 
received
 
ordained
 

defects

 
contrary

epilepsy

 

hindered

 

celebrating

 

leprosy

 

convicted

 

sentenced

 
notorious
 

understood

 
living
 

concubinage