FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973  
974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   >>   >|  
hose suspected of crime in order to put them to proof. Because we read in the Decretals: "It often happens that thefts are perpetrated in monasteries of monks; wherefore we command that when the brethren have to exonerate themselves of such acts, that the abbot shall celebrate Mass, or someone else deputed by him, in the presence of the community; and so, when the Mass is over, all shall communicate under these words: 'May the body of Christ prove thee today.'" And further on: "If any evil deed be imputed to a bishop or priest, for each charge he must say Mass and communicate, and show that he is innocent of each act imputed." But secret sinners must not be disclosed, for, once the blush of shame is set aside, they will indulge the more in sin, as Augustine says (De Verbis. Dom.; cf. Serm. lxxxii). Consequently, Christ's body is not to be given to occult sinners, even if they ask for it. _On the contrary,_ on Ps. 21:30: "All the fat ones of the earth have eaten and have adored," Augustine says: "Let not the dispenser hinder the fat ones of the earth," i.e. sinners, "from eating at the table of the Lord." _I answer that,_ A distinction must be made among sinners: some are secret; others are notorious, either from evidence of the fact, as public usurers, or public robbers, or from being denounced as evil men by some ecclesiastical or civil tribunal. Therefore Holy Communion ought not to be given to open sinners when they ask for it. Hence Cyprian writes to someone (Ep. lxi): "You were so kind as to consider that I ought to be consulted regarding actors, and that magician who continues to practice his disgraceful arts among you; as to whether I thought that Holy Communion ought to be given to such with the other Christians. I think that it is beseeming neither the Divine majesty, nor Christian discipline, for the Church's modesty and honor to be defiled by such shameful and infamous contagion." But if they be not open sinners, but occult, the Holy Communion should not be denied them if they ask for it. For since every Christian, from the fact that he is baptized, is admitted to the Lord's table, he may not be robbed of his right, except from some open cause. Hence on 1 Cor. 5:11, "If he who is called a brother among you," etc., Augustine's gloss remarks: "We cannot inhibit any person from Communion, except he has openly confessed, or has been named and convicted by some ecclesiastical or lay tribunal." Nevertheless
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973  
974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sinners

 

Communion

 
Augustine
 

Christ

 

Christian

 

imputed

 

public

 
communicate
 

occult

 

tribunal


ecclesiastical

 

secret

 

practice

 

disgraceful

 
continues
 

actors

 

magician

 

Therefore

 

Cyprian

 

robbers


denounced

 

writes

 
consulted
 
usurers
 
discipline
 

called

 
brother
 

robbed

 
remarks
 
convicted

Nevertheless
 

confessed

 
openly
 
inhibit
 

person

 

admitted

 
baptized
 
Divine
 

majesty

 
Church

beseeming

 

thought

 

Christians

 

modesty

 

denied

 

defiled

 
shameful
 

infamous

 
contagion
 

community